Search for: "Kane County Justice Court" Results 141 - 156 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Justice Department claims allowing the lower court ruling to stay in effect would “impose grave and irreparable harms on the government and the public. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:31 pm
  'These are the most compassionate people.'"  He described the awful moment at parties when new acquaintances ask about his kids.On page 4 was a story with this lede: "A 16-year-old boy accused of stabbing an Elgin High School teacher appeared Friday in Kane County circuit court on sex assault charges, offenses prosecutors allege took place about five months before the school attack. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Gene Editing Judith Daar, University of California Irvine School of Law, Human Germline Genome Editing: Dilemmas in Informed Consent Eileen Kane, Penn State Law, A Volatile Year in Human Genome Editing Myrisha Lewis, Howard University School of Law, The Coming Age of Gene Editing: Medical Promise, Regulation, and the Revival of Decades of Debate Maxwell Mehlman, Case Western Reserve University, Regulating Do-It-Yourself Gene Editing C. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Trump Can Be Sued by Police Over Jan. 6 Riot, Justice Department Says MSN – Rachel Weiner (Washington Post) | Published: 3/2/2023 Former President Trump can be held liable in court for the actions of the mob that overtook the Capitol January 6, 2021, the Justice Department said. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Congressional Black Caucus Seizes on Push for Racial Justice to Wield Greater Influence MSN – Rachel Bade, Karoun Demirjian, and Paul Kane (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2020 The Congressional Black Caucus is seizing the national moment of reckoning over systemic inequality and racial injustice to wield its greatest level of influence inside the Capitol and in national politics. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The complaint was filed with the Justice Department on behalf of Nickie Lum Davis. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Committee on Ethics and Elections also approved several bills related to campaign finance and one that would limit the terms of county commissioners. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Klein Distinguished Scholar Chair, University of Miami School of Law)“Social Media and the Weaponization of Free Speech”Expert Statement  Michael German (Fellow, Brennan Center for Justice, New York University School of Law)“Why the FBI Failed to Anticipate Violence at the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The panel’s ruling signaled an important moment in American jurisprudence, answering a question that had never been addressed by an appeals court: can former presidents escape being held accountable by the criminal justice system for things they did while in office? [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Barrack has been investigated for potentially violating the law requiring people who try to influence American policy or opinion at the direction of foreign governments or entities to disclose their activities to the Justice Department. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm by admin
District Court Judge John Kane on Thursday has denied a request by the Colorado Rail Passenger [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm by Pace Law School Library
Stevens confounds a century of Supreme Court conventionalism and redefines the limits of “entertainment. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
House Hands Trump a Second Impeachment, This Time with GOP Support MSN – Mike DeBonis and Paul Kane (Washington Post) | Published: 1/13/2021 The U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The move is another intervention by Trump in the nation’s justice system and underscores his willingness to flout the norms and standards that have governed presidential conduct for decades. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
    IntroductionOn September 28, 2007, Judge Winifred Smith of the Superior Court of Alamada County, California, took the extraordinary measure of invalidating an election result - an event that has only happened once before in California's history.[1] Measure R, originally voted upon in November 2004, was ordered back onto next year's ballot not because of electoral fraud or force majeure, but because 96% of the results from the election had… [read post]