Search for: "Kimbrough v. Kimbrough"
Results 141 - 160
of 340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2008, 10:44 pm
Citing the reasoning in the recent Supreme Court decision, Kimbrough v United States that permitted Federal District Courts to consider the "100-1" ratio when considering whether or not to sentence below the federal sentencing guidelines in crack (or cocaine base) cases, Tilem & Campbell asked the Courts to take the ruling one step further and declare the mandatory minimums unconstitutional. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 6:49 pm
US v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 2:55 pm
This case essentially denies a Kimbrough v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 21, 2008 US v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 7:27 pm
US v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 6:41 pm
A helpful reader informed me that the Third Circuit yesterday granted rehearing en banc in US v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:52 pm
A split decision today from the Eleventh Circuit in US v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 6:58 pm
Coincidentally, two circuits have published rulings today that order remands for resentencing based on Kimbrough: From the Second Circuit, US v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
Stevens, 25 F.3d 318 (6th Cir. 1994) and Oliver v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 4:15 am
In an important and lengthy new opinion, United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 9:15 pm
The Sixth Circuit's ruling yesterday to reverse a below-guideline sentence as unreasonable in US v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 2:12 am
In a long and intricate opinion covering lots of issues, the Ninth Circuit today affirmed an above-guideline sentence in US v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 8:01 pm
Yesterday, the First Circuit announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 7:30 pm
Pho, 433 F.3d 53 (2006) (our coverage here) remains vital after Kimbrough v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 8:16 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
In a long opinion that thoughtfully seeks to unpack the standards for substantive reasonableness review, a split Sixth Circuit panel in US v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 10:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 5:10 pm
And Kimbrough strongly suggests that courts can and should look to research reports by the Sentencing Commission when deciding whether and when and how to vary from the guidelines. [read post]
