Search for: "King v. State of North Carolina" Results 141 - 160 of 306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Cooper, which asks whether the Constitution gives Congress power to revoke the states’ immunity from suit for copyright infringement, the court “appeared likely … to rule that North Carolina’s display of a 300-year-old pirate ship’s salvage operation amounts to piracy. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am by Ronald Collins
In its cert. petition, North Carolina stated that “[t]wenty-four states now require an ultrasound to be performed or offered to a woman prior to the performance of an abortion. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm by Mandelman
Again, according to Bloomberg: “The Arizona lawsuit, filed in state court in Phoenix, seeks a court order holding the Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank in contempt for violating the agreement and requiring it to pay as much as $25,000 for each violation of the accord plus as much as $10,000 for each violation of the state’s consumer-fraud law. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
University of North Carolina, one of two challenges to affirmative action policies currently before the Court. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. and North Carolina Farm Bureau Federation v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 11:35 am
Miscellaneous * Colleen Chien, Of Trolls, Davids, Goliaths, and Kings: Narratives and Evidence in the Litigation of High-Tech Patents, North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 87, 2009 * Mazur v. eBay Inc., 2009 WL 1203937 (N.D. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:26 am by Joshua Thompson
  Alabama and (most of) North Carolina continue to be bound by 1964 data. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
(Case No. 10-CVS-361) a North Carolina judge ordered an online-news editor to produce the names of six anonymous posters who allegedly posted defamatory comments on his website – although one of them identified himself on a local AM radio station. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on the Court’s upcoming decision in King v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Stephen Halbrook
" It should have been obvious that something is amiss—why would a 1792 North Carolina statute refer to the King? [read post]