Search for: "L.B." Results 141 - 160 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2008, 6:29 am
View the article here 10/09/2008 By Paul Eakins, Staff Writer COURTS: Attorneys say L.B. law restricting where their clients may live or loiter violates Constitution. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 3:30 am
10-10-2008 California:COURTS: Attorneys say L.B. law restricting where their clients may live or loiter violates Constitution.LONG BEACH - Attorneys representing 35 registered sex offenders filed a civil rights lawsuit this week aimed at a strict sex offender ordinance that the City Council passed in March. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 4:54 pm
Moreover, the District's classification of Yankee Park as a mobile home court rather than a campground based upon the change was not arbitrary or capricious.NFP civil opinions today (2): Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of L.B., and David L. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
" Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of L.B. and L.C.; Lanny B. v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:23 pm
"In the present case, § 77-4111 requires the Commissioner to adopt and promulgate those rules and regulations, but only those rules that are necessary for carrying out the purposes of L.B. 775. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 8:59 pm
As reported by the Associated Press via the First Amendment Center website, this week Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman vetoed legislation (L.B. 39) that would have required petition circulators to be state residents and at least 18 years of age. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 10:17 am
We therefore affirm both the trial court's grant of partial summary judgment and the trial court's final judgment.NFP civil opinions today (1): Paternity of L.B., Shellie Shaw v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 3:10 am
This week the Energy Independence Bill (NE L.B. 921) was introduced before the Nebraska State Legislature. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 3:28 pm
However, this is precisely what the Court suggested, and it is consistent with the Court's decision in San Remo Hotel L.B. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 3:28 pm
However, this is precisely what the Court suggested, and it is consistent with the Court's decision in San Remo Hotel L.B. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 2:58 pm
"Additionally, because the patentee both criticized prior art gutter guards that used adhesives and amended the patent's claims to require a "weld" to the exclusion of other modes of attachment, the district court's holding that infringement under the doctrine of equivalents was barred by prosecution history estoppel was also affirmed.More detail of L.B. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 9:29 am
" Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of L.B. and K.B., Barry Bogart v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 11:57 pm
Add on top of that since 2003( § 75-136, as amended by L.B. 187, effective date August 31, 2003) the appeals would go first to District Court instead of straight to the court of appeals. [read post]