Search for: "LANDMARK SERVICE COMPANY, LLC"
Results 141 - 160
of 171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Non-final orders, jurisdiction, and fresh pasta with tomatoes, rosemary and braised kale with garlic
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
., Appellees. 3rd District.Attorney's fees -- Unjust enrichment -- Plaintiff attorneys recruited by defendant attorneys to handle health care provider claims against insurance company -- Action arising out of defendants' conduct in engineering a secret multimillion dollar settlement of all clients' claims, which resulted in defendants receiving millions in attorney's fees and plaintiffs receiving just over four thousand dollars -- Unjust enrichment claim was not barred… [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
The agency says Rio Algom Mining LLC has agreed to investigate levels of contamination at 1 of its sites near Gallup N.M. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
In Geophysical Service Incorporated v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:01 pm
He previously owned a condominium unit in the Landmark Lofts in Grand Rapids. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court: Canwest v Horizon… [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
: (Spicy IP), India: DCGI preparing document to implement patent-registration linkage: (Spicy IP), New Zealand: Generic pharmaceutical companies taking advantage of NZ IP laws and medicines regulations: (International Law Office), Uganda: Cipla licenses ARV technology into Uganda: (Afro-IP), US: Money saved through generic prescriptions: (GenericsWeb), US: Government plans to keep close tab on drug patent settlements: (GenericsWeb), US: FTC reports 14 deals to delay generics in 2007:… [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
The CDA was struck down in 1997 in a landmark case, Reno v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 6:53 pm
Click Here Ocean Protein LLC Pays nearly $22,000 for Failure to Properly Report Hazardous Chemicals. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 3:00 am
The Trump Media and Technology Group has not yet released any products to the public and missed its self-imposed deadline to roll out a beta-test version of its social media service in November. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
However, Google and DeepMind argue that the case should be dismissed following the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Lloyd v Google LLC [2021] UKSC 50, in which it was held that uniform damages could not be obtained for each member of the class [148]. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The other three defendants include the City of West Point, West Point Dairy Products, LLC, (WPDP); and Wimmers Meat Products, Inc. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 8:30 pm
A dozen current and former employees and close observers of the company reconstructed the critical decision, marked by tearful meetings, bitter internal arguments, and the culmination of years of debate within the company. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
The case raises issues of such significance to copyright holders and online service providers that it may well end up as a landmark precedent of the U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here Conservationists, oil company reach agreement on offshore drilling. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 5:32 am
The employees cited the California Supreme Court’s landmark 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
Brand X Internet Services. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
The lawmakers say the companies deceived European lawmakers during negotiations on two landmark laws by hiding behind fronts. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398 (2007) (eliminating technical hurdles for proving an invention obvious and instead applying a “common sense” analysis for assessing patentability); · Make it more difficult for a patent holding company to obtain injunctive relief to stop ongoing infringement, eBay Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
