Search for: "LG Electronics, Inc"
Results 141 - 160
of 477
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2012, 5:23 pm
International Trade Commission on Tuesday launched a Section 337 investigation into certain wireless consumer electronics devices and components to determine whether devices imported into the U.S. by Amazon.com, LG Electronics, Samsung Electronics, Nintendo Co. and others violate three companies' patent rights regarding high speed microprocessors. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:23 pm
International Trade Commission on Tuesday launched a Section 337 investigation into certain wireless consumer electronics devices and components to determine whether devices imported into the U.S. by Amazon.com, LG Electronics, Samsung Electronics, Nintendo Co. and others violate three companies' patent rights regarding high speed microprocessors. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:23 pm
International Trade Commission on Tuesday launched a Section 337 investigation into certain wireless consumer electronics devices and components to determine whether devices imported into the U.S. by Amazon.com, LG Electronics, Samsung Electronics, Nintendo Co. and others violate three companies' patent rights regarding high speed microprocessors. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 3:21 pm
LG Electronics Inc. of South Korea sued a joint venture of Toshiba Corp. and Samsung Electronics Co. in federal court in Delaware alleging infringement of four U.S. patents for optical-disc technology. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:11 am
The devices were manufactured by LG Electronics (TIanjin) Appliance Co. [read post]
Chief Judge Sleet construes claim terms relating to refrigerator ice bin and dispenser technologies.
30 Jul 2012, 8:48 am
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:37 pm
The 13 companies are AT&T, Verizon Wireless, Sprint Nextel, T-Mobile, Apple, HTC, Motorola Mobility, Palm, LG, Samsung, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:52 am
After LG refused to pay, Wi-LAN forwarded the results of the Townsend inquiry (the Townsend Letter) to LG. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:16 am
By way of background, the investigation is based on a June 3, 2011 complaint filed by OSRAM GmbH (“OSRAM”) alleging that Respondents LG Electronics, Inc., LG Innotek Co., Ltd., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:33 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea and LG Electronics, U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:31 pm
On March 8, 2012, OSRAM served supplemental responses to certain contention interrogatories (including infringement contentions and domestic industry contentions) on respondents LG Electronics, Inc., LG Innotek Co., Ltd., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 12:42 pm
., 232 F.R.D. 103, 113 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) & citing LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:23 am
LG Electronics, Inc. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:48 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following respondents in this investigation: LG Electronics, Inc., of the Republic of Korea; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Mitsubishi Electric Corp. of Japan; Mitsubishi Electric US Holdings, Inc., of Cypress, CA; Mitsubishi Electric and Electronics USA, Inc., of Vernon Hills, IL; Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions America,… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:18 pm
The complaint alleges that LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea and LG Electronics, U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (collectively, “LG”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain integrated circuit packages provided with multiple heat-conducting paths and products containing same that infringe one or more claims of U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm
In the Order, ALJ Rogers denied Complainants LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Innotek Co. [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:38 pm
Respondent LG Electronics, Inc. and other LG entities (collectively, LG) opposed the motion. [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Ex Parte LG Electronics Deutschland GmbH (S.D. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:16 pm
’s (collectively, “OSRAM”) motion to exclude certain domestic industry products that Complainants LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Innotek Co. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Samsung Electronics Co. and LG Electronics Inc. (066570) have already paid $964 million in settlements to Kodak for using the technology. [read post]
