Search for: "LONDON V. STATE"
Results 141 - 160
of 4,117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Do Louisiana Cases Against Lloyds Have to Go to Arbitration if the Policy Has an Arbitration Clause?
4 Oct 2023, 5:59 am
—Ellen DeGeneres 1Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:57 am
Or is this concept state-centric? [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:22 am
In the case of Shehla Zia v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
Two women who were arrested while attending a Sarah Everard vigil in Clapham Common, London in 2021 have been paid substantial damages and received an apology from the Metropolitan Police. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] United States of America v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 10:16 am
On a) the first instance Judge had correctly held that there were deficiencies in Reading’s formal Equality Act assessment, but also correctly found, following London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Patrick (2019) EWHC 1263 (QB) (our note) that the PSED did not have to be in the form of a single formal exercise. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 10:39 pm
United KingdomUnison v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:00 am
: Federally-Funded Legal Aid and the Civil Rights Movement" November 8 Noam Maggor, Senior Lecturer, Queen Mary University of London; Visiting Fellow, Sciences Po Law School "Law and Development: Railroad Regulation as American Industrial Policy" November 22 Rachel Shelden, Director of the Richards Civil War Era Center; Associate Professor of History, Penn State University "Justices, Politics, and the Union in Crisis" November 29 Laura… [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm
Whether all reasonable steps have been taken will be fact-specific and the hurdle is a high one; the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) stated in its Statutory Code of Practice that “an employer would be considered to have taken all reasonable steps if there were no further steps that they could have been expected to take…” The scope of the defence was recently considered by the employment tribunal (ET) in Fischer v London United Busways Ltd,… [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:18 pm
” United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 6:40 am
Consequently, absences for ART treatment can still be dealt with in the same way as other forms of illness absence without being discriminatory (London Borough of Greenwich v Robinson (unreported; [1995] UKEAT 745)). [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The Council of Europe itself was brought into being on 5 May 1949 by the Treaty of London. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:49 pm
Select Additional Sources Shortland, Anja, Lost Art: The Art Loss Register Casebook Vol I (2021) at page 9 ↑ ibid, at page 39 ↑ Cases discussed in this chapter by Shortland: United States of America v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm
Islam & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Haringey (2022) EWHC 3933 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Haringey’s refusal to award Mr Islam Band A priority on its housing register, rather than Band B. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:50 am
Nonetheless, judicial acknowledgement that this is the state we are in, where being shipped from London to Walsall is pretty much inevitable for single parent families is profoundly depressing. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs; Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || lcb11@psu.edu First I want to thank Marcelo Thompson, Han Zhu, and Dean Fu Hualing, and all those who organized this workshop. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:43 am
This was the case in R v Rogers [2014] EWCA Crim 1680, where there was no act of money laundering in England but it was sufficient that the underlying fraud generating the criminal property took place in England and there were English victims. [read post]
