Search for: "LOPEZ V. IN RE:" Results 141 - 160 of 430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm by Orin Kerr
If you take that view, then once you have analyzed the individual mandate under existing Commerce Clause doctrine, you’re basically done: There is no more added power under the Necessary and Proper Clause, as the Lopez test has already factored in that power. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
Lopez, which struck down the Gun Free School Zones Act, and the second was US v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 10:36 am
We also represent a putative intervenor (the Catawba River Water Supply Project) in an original action, South Carolina v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
Lopez (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 615, 629.)In re Malik J., supra.The court then took up Malik J. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:15 am by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court's ruling Tuesday in the Martinez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Office of Criminal Investigation,  Miami Field Office, and Anthony V. [read post]