Search for: "Lady v State" Results 141 - 160 of 1,744
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2022, 10:34 pm
After all, the iconic figure holding the scales of justice is a lady. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
DeWeese-Boyd, 21-145, involves the First Amendment-based “ministerial exception,” most recently seen in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Stated otherwise, not only do compelled speech objections to directives about pronouns and titles largely sidestep the reality that courtrooms are already places of highly regulated speech, they are also taken up by some to disguise an underlying discriminatory ideology. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am by INFORRM
On 15 November 2021 judgment in Mueen-Udin v Secretary of State for the Home Department was handed down by Nicol J. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 12:41 pm by Giles Peaker
(This latter was disposed of quickly on the basis that Lady Hale’s comments in Nzolameso v City of Westminster [2015] UKSC 22; [2015] HLR 2 on procurement policies were obiter reccomendations, rather than a requirement.) [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:18 am by Andrew Wainer
There is perhaps no region of the world more important than the Northern Triangle and Mexico in terms of the impact of corruption on the United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 4:09 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
Tom Cotton, the Gray Lady’s riot-act-reading bête noire, is back with an op-ed (but at NRO this time) in support of qualified immunity – the well-known judicial doctrine that protects state employees from being sued under a federal statute, 42 USC § 1983, when they violate someone’s rights. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm by Mukarrum Ahmed
  In FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Lady Brownlie [2021] UKSC 45 (“Brownlie II”), the Supreme Court held as a matter of ratio by a 4:1 majority that consequential loss satisfies the ‘tort gateway’ in Practice Direction (“PD”) 6B, para. 3.1(9)(a). [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 5:00 pm by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Majera (formerly SM (Rwanda)) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department – heard 10th May 2021. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
” United States The US songwriter Phoebe Bridgers is being sued for defamation by producer Chris Nelson, who claims she “intentionally used her high-profile public platform on Instagram to publish false and defamatory statements regarding [Nelson] in order to destroy his reputation. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
Lord Justice Arnold and Lord Justice Birss disagreed on the outcome, with the tie being broken by Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing, agreeing with Arnold LJ that the DABUS applications should be deemed withdrawn. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
Lord Justice Arnold and Lord Justice Birss disagreed on the outcome, with the tie being broken by Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing, agreeing with Arnold LJ that the DABUS applications should be deemed withdrawn. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]