Search for: "Land v. Rose" Results 141 - 160 of 311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2011, 9:56 am by By Erik Lundegaard
Helping to propel her career have been a number of landmark cases, including Thompson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 3:59 am by Amy Howe
” At Truthdig, Rose Aguilar interviews Stephanie Toti, the lead counsel for the petitioners in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 4:46 am
This has now been given, last Friday, by Mr Justice Floyd (Chancery Division, England and Wales) in Land Securities plc, Capital Shopping Centres plc and Hammerson plc v Registrar of Trade Marks [2008] EWHC 1744 (Pat).This was a decision in respect of three joined cases, which were heard together in order to determine the question of whether the operator of a shopping centre could register a trade mark for the services it might provide (White Rose, Victoria Centre and Eden… [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
The Norton Rose Fulbright Data Protection Report has an article on the recent EU decisions relating to Google Analytics and the impact on business. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am by Eric Goldman
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 580-81 (1994) (“Parody needs to mimic an original to make its point”). [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
In essence, a property seller could “park” the proceeds of a land sale with LES until an appropriate land swap counterparty emerged, allowing the “exchange” to take place. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am by Giles Peaker
Partridge v Gupta (2017) EWHC 2110 (QB) Those who have been readers of this blog for a while may recall our campaign about evictions by High Court Sheriffs where the writs were (wrongly) obtained as an administrative act by using form N293A. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am by Giles Peaker
Partridge v Gupta (2017) EWHC 2110 (QB) Those who have been readers of this blog for a while may recall our campaign about evictions by High Court Sheriffs where the writs were (wrongly) obtained as an administrative act by using form N293A. [read post]