Search for: "Laster Inc" Results 141 - 160 of 300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2016, 2:45 pm by Carl Neff
Vice Chancellor Laster likened the case to Quadrant Structured Products Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 11:21 am by John Jascob
Consulting Agreement Derivative Litigation, January 15, 2016, Laster, J.).Dismissal efforts. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 1:02 pm by Jason M. Halper
  Almost one year earlier, in May 2010, Rural was considering potential acquisition targets, including its primary competitor, American Medical Response, Inc. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:00 am by Alexis Yee-Garcia
Travis Laster landed another blow against M&A litigation disclosure only settlements with his decision in In re Aruba Networks Inc. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 5:56 am
On August 27, 2015, Vice Chancellor Laster authored a widely anticipated opinion providing valuable guidance on steering clear of a flawed process in a going-private transaction. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Laster held Murdock and Carter jointly and severally liable for damages of $148.1 million, plus pre- and post-judgment interest. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 6:05 am by Travis Taylor
In In re Appraisal of Dell (July 13, 2015), Vice Chancellor Laster, stating that he was compelled by Delaware Supreme Court precedent, applied a “strict” interpretation of the “Continuous Holder Requirement” of the Delaware appraisal statute. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 7:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Among these recently filed suits was the shareholders derivative lawsuit filed in Delaware Chancery Court action June 2014 by a shareholder of Healthways, Inc. against the companies board of directors and against the company as nominal defendant. [read post]