Search for: "Latham v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
A unit of state government is immune from suit and liability unless the state consents. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:58 am
However, Nite Moves, an adult club in Latham, New York, begs to differ with the state’s interpretation of adult and exotic dances. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:11 pm
In recognition of the changing governance environment, the Latham & Watkins law firm has published an interesting memo entitled “12 Steps to Truly Good Corporate Governance” (here). [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:57 pm
Amounts less than Cravath, but hey, no state income tax, plus the 3500 square feet and the Lexus.Yet again, the market leader in Texas.But another V&E tipster expressed displeasure:Of course, this is not market, and it hasn’t done much to raise associate morale. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 6:56 pm
That was Justice Scalia this morning in Davis v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
Latham v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:05 am
**Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:39 am
Therefore, the Court denies Defendants’ motion to the extent they rely on Dastar.Under the Latham Act, a plaintiff can recover for the defendant stating a false origin of the goods it is selling in a manner that is likely to cause confusion about the origin of goods. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
A thousand thanks to the IPKat's friends at the London office of Latham & Watkins LLP for hosting this year's IP Publishers and Editors Lunch on behalf of this weblog. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:21 am
Buchanan emphasized that state tort law provided an incentive to exceed what were minimum standards, and he argued that Wyeth v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:58 am
Smith of Latham & Watkins LLP. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:19 am
The nearly-annual IP Publishers and Editors Lunch, which the recession nearly killed off last year, is back again this year, thanks to the generous hospitality of the London office of Latham & Watkins LLP. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:49 pm
It was incorrect to state that Ms McKennitt did not claim that the contents of the book were untrue. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
Buxton LJ, with whom Latham and Longmore LJJ agreed, stated that:- “The width of the rights given to the media by A v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 9:18 am
Kam Lee Yuen Trading Co. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:14 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:43 pm
We might see Maples v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
Meanwhile Longmore LJ stated that: The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private, not whether it is true or false. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:35 pm
Lilly Ledbetter, plaintiff, Ledbetter v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:00 am
” CTS Corp. v. [read post]
