Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 141 - 160
of 15,210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2021, 3:47 am
Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178; see generally CDR Créances S.A.S. v Cohen, 23 NY3d 307, 315; ), no such cause of action has been pleaded in this case (see DeMartino v Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP, 189 AD3d 774, 775). [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 9:57 am
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard argument in an important Social Security Disability Insurance case, Biestek v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 11:00 pm
Seventh Circuit rejects defense proposed jury instruction and cross-examination of detective concerning possible violation of state law requiring interrogations be recorded, since any violation of state law was irrelevant, in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Overriding Pennsylvania law to permit cross-jurisdictional class action tolling in federal court of state law economic loss claims.Stone v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 11:56 am
Briscoe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:50 am
When I read Padilla v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:08 pm
The right of cross-examination is an absolute right, the denial of which may constitute a denial of due process of law. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:12 am
The post Unusual Cross-Ideological Agreement in Tyler v. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 6:29 pm
In American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 10:21 am
Additional Resources: Deadly Crash Came After Years of Complaints About Rail Crossing, Nov. 10, 2015, By McNelly Torres and Willard Shephard, NBC Miami More Blog Entries: Estate of Gagnon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:17 am
Earlier this month, a Missouri appellate court issued a written opinion in the case of Brown v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 8:34 am
D. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:39 am
Cross-posted at Opinio JurisIn something of a surprise move, the Supreme Court decided today to grant cert in Kiyemba v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:10 am
In a court order approving a settlement agreement (full text) in Greene v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
Grace v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 5:35 pm
The judgment The statement of the law in this area was summarised by the Court of Appeal in Imerman v Echenguiz [2010] EWCA Civ 908, in which Lord Neuberger MR said “where a privileged document had been seen by an opposing party through fraud or mistake, the court has power to exercise its equitable confidentiality jurisdiction, and ‘should ordinarily intervene, unless the case is one where the injunction can properly be refused on the general principles affecting the… [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Tørsløv, T. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 9:08 am
Before the court in the case of Tickle v Council of the Borough of North Tyneside and others ([2015] EWHC 2991 (Fam)) were cross applications by a journalist and the local authority regarding care proceedings which the former wished to report. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:15 am
A decision last week out of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 3:21 am
In BUQ v HRE, Mr Justice Warby granted the claimant summary judgment and a permanent injunction prohibiting the disclosure of private information even though a cross-application to commit the claimant for contempt of court was to be determined at a later date. [read post]
