Search for: "Lawrence Friedman"
Results 141 - 160
of 513
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
Friedman Contact: customslawblog@gmail.com Twitter: @customslawblog (c) 2020 All Rights Reserved. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:05 am
New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.Friedman, Lawrence J. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 6:58 pm
Friedman Contact: customslawblog@gmail.com Twitter: @customslawblog (c) 2020 All Rights Reserved. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:55 am
Friedman Contact: customslawblog@gmail.com Twitter: @customslawblog (c) 2020 All Rights Reserved. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 4:24 pm
”Lewis CarrollAlice in WonderlandBy Lawrence M. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 10:33 am
Click the image.By Lawrence M. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 1:38 pm
But, alas, unless this decision is reversed we will never know.By Lawrence M. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 4:08 am
” In a series of posts at The Interdependent Third Branch, here, here and here, Lawrence Friedman and Jordan Singer discuss the prospects for “achieving educational and experiential diversity on the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 5:52 am
Lawrence Friedman is the SPILS faculty director. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:30 pm
(The first legal history public conversation I can remember going to involved Lawrence Friedman, who had just published his History of American Law, at Harvard Law School, talking about how everyone there had a distorted and mistaken understanding of what mattered “in” law because they spent their time looking at the pictures on the wall of eminent, mostly British, jurists.). [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 6:58 am
Lawrence M. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Like Professor Lawrence M. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
The Stanford Daily on Lawrence Friedman's "Introduction to American Law" (scroll to item 5)From the Washington Post's Made by History section: Timothy Stewart-Winter (Rutgers University-Newark) on "How the black press helped pave the way for gay rights"; Shahrukh Khan (J.D. candidate, Emory University School of Law) on "The Supreme Court’s illiberal legacy. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Last month, in an unsigned, per curiam opinion, Box v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
At The Interdependent Third Branch, Lawrence Friedman pushes back against Justice Neil Gorsuch’s suggestion in a concurrence that the plaintiffs did not have had standing to challenge the cross, arguing that “abandoning ‘offended observer’ standing in the Establishment Clause context would … mean that public displays that obviously violate the constitution would become more common. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 am
But they’re quite good at dressing up their resentments as progressive [Daniel Friedman, Quillette] “Does Yale Law School’s Antidiscrimination Policy on Subsidies for Student Employment Discriminate on the Basis of Religion? [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
For the symposium on Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum's new book, The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court (Oxford University Press, 2019).John O. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:26 am
Or will seeing Jennifer Lawrence scamming millions in the look forever taint it? [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 8:27 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2019)I have just posted a draft of a new essay: "The Cri de Jessup Sixty Years Later: Transnational Law’s Intangible Objects and Abstracted Frameworks Beyond Nation, Enterprise, and Law. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am
At The Interdependent Third Branch, Lawrence Friedman writes that “Thomas’s opinions preview what Chief Justice Roberts may look forward to should more justices be appointed who share not just Thomas’s interpretive approach, but his willingness to cast aside settled rules in favor of a return to the presumed original understanding of the constitution. [read post]
