Search for: "Leahy v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am
United States, in which the Justices will hear arguments next Monday. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:16 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am
President the executive authority, with confirmation by the Senate, to appoint all “Officers of the United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am
President the executive authority, with confirmation by the Senate, to appoint all “Officers of the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 3:56 am
by Dennis Crouch Helsinn v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 12:26 am
Note here that the argument is not based upon a statute codified in the United States Code since it is only a temporary provision that will sunset after three more years. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 1:00 pm
Pat Leahy (D-Vt.) introduced a resolution expressing “the sense of the Senate that the United States must not bar individuals from entering into the United States based on their religion, as such action would be contrary to the fundamental principles on which this nation was founded. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:03 am
If you fail to do so, Americans who are detained abroad maywell lose the critical protection of ensured access to United States consular officers. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:23 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
Additionally, both pre- and post- issuance opposition has long existed for United States trademarks. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm
If the new Justice analyzes the current state of minority electoral opportunity in the United States as did Scalia, the new statute probably won’t survive constitutionality. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:00 am
The US Supreme Court issued the much-awaited decision in Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 2:13 pm
United States, 729 F.2d 1429, 1436 (Fed. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 9:11 am
Clontech Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
(relisted after the October 12 conference) United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 1:45 pm
Perhaps Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), has an idea. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:33 pm
In the 2008 Supreme Court case Medellin v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 8:21 am
The Bush administration declared that the United States would abide by the judgment. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
If, however, the Federal Government is the alleged patent infringer, the patent owner must sue the Government in the United States Court of Federal Claims and may recover only “reasonable and entire compensation” for the unauthorized use. 28 U. [read post]
