Search for: "Leahy v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 354
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2015, 8:51 pm
National Security Letter Program Reforms Title V of the new House bill reforms the FBI’s national security letter program in similar fashion as the Leahy bill did. [read post]
11 May 2015, 10:12 pm
Another change was the introduction of a clause allowing the intelligence community to obtain an emergency exception to spy within the United States on a “non-United States person” for 72 hours—without any court order. [read post]
2 May 2015, 6:22 am
The case, Spokeo v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
In Massachusetts, for example, our state high court ruled in Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:08 am
The bill also blocks certain transfers of Guantanamo Bay detainees to the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:01 am
The Times of Israel analyzes why this coalition, notable for being one of the few to exclude the two Haredi parties, Shas and United Torah Judaism, disintegrated so quickly. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 10:12 am
Wells provided dispatches from yesterday’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
Leahy’s letter also points out that such a tactic carries “ethical and legal risks” as it “raises questions of copyright and trademark infringement” and “independent press. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
In Weber v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 6:55 am
On Friday, Zoe Bedell summarized the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights on extraditions to the United States: Trabelsi v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:58 pm
Russian President Vladimir V. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:45 am
To solve the problem, the United States needs a way to identify unknown terrorists, who might be communicating and conspiring with the known ones. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 11:23 am
At the weak end, it included the question of whether the Third Amendment applies to the states, a matter is that is of no apparent interest to the United States and has no prospective effect on it. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:20 am
See Shadwick v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:54 am
Consider in that regard the Supreme Court’s Rule 19, which not only provides wholly different procedures for cases in which a question has been certified by a Court of Appeals, but also stresses that “When a question is certified by a United States court of appeals, this Court, on its own motion or that of a party, may consider and decide the entire matter in controversy. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm
As compared to the House bill, the Leahy bill would raise the bar on what such applications must state. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Circuit Court’s en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
(collectively, “MadStad”) filed suit against the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), its then director, David Kappos, in his official capacity, and the United States of America (collectively, “the Government”) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. [read post]
