Search for: "Leathers v. Leathers" Results 141 - 160 of 501
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2012, 11:41 am
On August 12, 2010, Bruch received a phone call from an Alaska Airlines ticket agent reporting that Russell, described as a black male wearing a leather jacket and a large necklace, had paid cash for a last-minute, one-way ticket to Anchorage, Alaska. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:56 pm by Milord A. Keshishian
It appears that third-party knockoffs of the Birkin Bag are so prevalent that numerous Youtube videos have been posted to spot the alleged fakes: The case is Hermès International v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 7:13 am
Supreme Court issued one of its most noteworthy antitrust decisions in decades in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 1:54 am
Specifically, he addressed the legality of:Conditioning trade funds on minimum retail price points consistent with the resale price maintenance standards of Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 7:19 pm
In the last Supreme Court term, a 5-4 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 7:03 am by Eric Goldman
YouTube Schedule A Defendants A Judge Enumerates a SAD Scheme Plaintiff’s Multiple Abuses, But Still Won’t Award Sanctions–Jiangsu Huari Webbing Leather v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:20 am by Howard Ullman
Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc., No. 101,000 (May 4, 2012). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:08 am
 For the answer to that question we turn to Case C‑655/11 P, Seven for all mankind LLC v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Seven SpA SAM applied to register the word sign SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND as a Community trade mark for ‘jewellery, namely, jewellery made of precious metals and stones, bracelets, earrings, rings, necklaces, cufflinks, tie tacks, tie fasteners, pins, watches, watchbands, belt buckles of precious metals’ (Class 14) and… [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 10:41 am
Weaver -- federal appeals court authority to overturn a death sentence because of a prosecutor's closing argument at the sentencing phase Mon., March 26 06-480, Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
Copyrights in Characters, Literary Works, Collaborative Works, Work-for-Hire, Assignments of Copyright, Renewal of CopyrightsGary Friedrich Enterprises LLC v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 4:25 pm by Larry
That means that the decision of the full United States Court of Appeals in Trek Leather stands as the law of the land. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 11:00 am
Billing and Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 12:40 pm by David Lat
– Judge Stephen Dillard of the Court of Appeals of Georgia, in footnote 2 of Orton v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 9:46 am by Nedim Malovic
Other factors may also be considered, such as the distribution channels of the goods concerned (Caventa v OHIM, T‑224/11).In the present case, the goods were neither of the same nature nor the same purpose, nor were they of the same type nor intended for the same purpose or for the same use. [read post]