Search for: "Levy v. State Of California"
Results 141 - 160
of 526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2012, 9:45 pm
[Disclosure: Horvitz & Levy filed an amicus brief, supporting the defendant, on behalf of the California Attractions and Parks Association.] [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:14 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Kasky (2002) while she was still a member of the California Supreme Court. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm
Similarly, in Doe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:37 pm
Since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Knox v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:44 am
Smith and Carafano v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 10:09 am
In SONY v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:26 pm
If we accept the state’s argument that it’s an excise tax, then it’s probably an unconstitutional one, because it fails to meet the nexus requirements established in cases like Complete Auto Transit v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:05 am
” NFIB weighs in on Knick v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:41 pm
Sure enough, in this case Curt Manufacturing had opted for Arizona, not California, and Sabin did not know any lawyers who might help him in Arizona. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:26 am
” People v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 8:07 am
Andre V. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 8:12 pm
Sanchez v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
United States and Town of Vernon v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
This is most explicit in Johnston v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 6:49 am
., v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 6:49 am
., v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 11:49 am
will respond to subpoenas only in California or other states where they have offices). [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:59 pm
California Gambling Control Commission ("notice of levy," collection)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmGustafson v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 9:42 am
Since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Knox v. [read post]
