Search for: "Lewis v. AT&T Corporate" Results 141 - 160 of 441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
The instant appeal involves the latest in a series of legal proceedings prompted by the efforts of the Washington County Health Department ("the Health Department") to inspect property of Old Paths and its pastor, John Lewis ("Lewis"), for alleged sewage disposal violations, and the stance of Old Paths and Lewis that entry onto private land must be preceded by permission, a warrant, or exigent circumstances. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
” The Court held that “the purchase price provision of the agreement [was] unenforceable, and the value of plaintiff's stock should therefore be determined pursuant to the formula set forth in the unrelated New York case, Lewis v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:21 am by Bob Ambrogi
” That fight went all the way to the Supreme Court, resulting in 2020 in a watershed ruling for public access to primary legal materials, Georgia v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:20 pm
  Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Removing State Constitution Badges of Inferiority, 22 Lewis & Clark Law Review 1151-1198 (2018).Patrick J. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
Opponents of birth control insisted that the issue was simple: “If a woman didn’t want to get pregnant, then she shouldn’t do anything that might get her pregnant. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am by INFORRM
Judgment in British Broadcasting Corporation -v- Sugar was given on 23 June 2010. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:18 am by Christopher Spizzirri
Recently, Vice Chancellor Laster gave some of us a jolt with a bench ruling on a discovery dispute in Roffe v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
“The problem is you just can’t get a big enough class,” he said. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:37 am by Rebecca M. Guidry
R.S. 38:2325(B) which states that it holds property “as an instrumentality of the State of Louisiana[;]” the Fifth Circuit pointed out that the statute also states “[t]itle to all property acquired by the Authority shall be taken in its corporate name. [read post]