Search for: "Lexmark International, Inc."
Results 141 - 160
of 223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
Smith has devoted his life to the office supply company founded by his father—a company that’s now under legal attack by printing behemoth Lexmark International, Inc. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:44 am
Hynes In Lexmark International v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:30 am
See Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:59 am
On April 14, 2015, the Federal Circuit, on its own motion, ordered an en banc hearing of Lexmark International v. [read post]
Of Printer Cartridges and Patent Exhaustion: The En Banc Federal Circuit is Poised to Clarify Quanta
21 Apr 2015, 7:19 pm
Lexmark International, Inc. sells its patented printer cartridges directly to customers and indirectly through authorized resellers. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:44 am
Lexmark International, Inc., rejected the argument that Lexmark and its customers lacked a “meeting of the minds,” holding instead that the Return Program “clearly set[s] forth contractual terms” of the type that have been “held to be valid. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:09 pm
Lexmark Int’l. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:40 am
Minton, 133 S.Ct. 1059 (2013) (federal jurisdiction over cases involving patent law) Lexmark Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:19 pm
Advanced Fluid Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:14 am
Plans, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
In 2012 PepperBall Technologies Inc. was liquidated and foreclosed and now PepperBall Technologies Inc. and brands belong to Phoenix International LLC. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 9:53 am
Underground Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:33 pm
The Supreme Court recently issued two decisions, Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:39 am
You might recall that the Court addressed Lanham Act standing earlier this term in Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:17 am
On March 25, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:17 am
On March 25, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 9:05 am
. - The United States Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a Sixth Circuit ruling that intellectual property lawyers for defendant Static Control Components, Inc. of Sanford, North Carolina had properly pled a counterclaim for false advertising under the Lanham Act against Lexmark International, Inc. of Lexington, Kentucky. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:29 am
The second is the recent decision in Lexmark International v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:30 pm
While waiting for my flight to leave San Diego on my way to Washington, DC for the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting, I saw on Twitter—the best source for immediate Supreme Court news—that the Supreme Court had decided Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 10:56 am
Case citation: Lexmark International Inc. v. [read post]
