Search for: "Lights v. Kelly" Results 141 - 160 of 470
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
§924(c)(3)(B), is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit erred when it affirmed the exclusion of the petitioner’s expert rebuttal testimony regarding his future dangerousness in violation of Kelly v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm by Aurora Barnes
§ 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 3:33 pm
"So basically, for up to three days (or more), you're crammed into a room with no bed, freezing your butt off with only a Mylar sheet, crammed into a tiny room with the lights on 24/7, unable to sleep or lie down -- again, for three days -- while people get moved in and out all day and night.Not good. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
The panel discussion was on the doctrine of equivalents following the Actavis v Lilly decision. [read post]