Search for: "Little v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 141 - 160
of 220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (R. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
In Zamora v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 8:38 am
While there are avenues that could theoretically allow courts to invalidate a political or unscientific grant of an EUA, there is little case law to rely upon. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
By way of comparison, in 2019 there were 62 federal court securities suits against non-U.S. companies, representing about 15% of all federal court securities suit filings in 2019. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am
Implications for huge range of internet actors According to Dr Erdos the implications of the judgment are vast, not just for search engines but for a range of internet actors, in fact for all online operators including news archives, blogger, social networks, social networkers, ratings websites, and street mapping services. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 1:56 am
Alden crt ofcrs; peace ofcr Last Act: 07/18/07 VETOED MEMO.63 S6100
GRIFFO -- Relates to binding arbitration in negotiations with members who are designated as security services or security supervisors Same as A 930 BLURB : Civ Serv. coll nego; security ser Last Act: 07/18/07 VETOED MEMO.70 S6204
LITTLE -- Designates members of the campus safety department of Paul Smith's College as peace officers Same as Uni. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm
Commissioner Couy Griffin, due to his involvement in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Title690
S1325B
LANZA -- Creates the thirteenth judicial district consisting of the county of Richmond 689
S6521
MAZIARZ -- Makes provisions for the deaths or permanent or temporary disabilities of employees of voluntary hospitals in connection with the World Trade Center attacks 688
S6514
NOZZOLIO -- Relates to compensation, benefits and conditions of employment for certain state officers and employees who are members of the… [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
Tobacco Securities Trust Co. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
Department of Homeland Security, Diallo v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
Many of us are socialized to believe that more information is better. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Also important was the courts efforts, preemptively, to consider the effects of the PRC Data Security Law and [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Two years later, the Court followed this up in Pierce v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
I see very little distinction — or any — between that and handing someone a piece of paper that says stock. [read post]
