Search for: "Little v. United Investors Corporation"
Results 141 - 160
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Questionnaires should require information on whether the nominee is an employee, officer, partner or co-investor of the nominating stockholder. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
And in the Flatow case, known as Flatow v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
The fact that we have one without the other makes little sense. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:27 pm
In Jones et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
The proposed guidance focuses on the management of safety and soundness risks from climate change through corporate governance, internal control framework, risk management process, data aggregation and reporting, and scenario analysis. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 1:50 pm
Section 3(c)(7) exempts funds that are only open to qualified investors, who are investors with at least $5 million in investments; however, there is no limitation on the number of such investors in a fund exempt under Section 3(c)(7). [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 456 U.S. 717, 721 (1982). [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:03 am
United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am
But, until then, and absent any information to the contrary, what am I or anyone else to think other than that you are the epitome of the worst sort of corporate citizen… the sort of bank that is not to be trusted… a bank that we should all warn our children about… a bank that should reasonably be despised for its behavior. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:20 am
[Local Loan Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 2:16 am
There must be a minimum of two (2) directors appointed to the fund - corporate or individuals. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 11:35 am
I say this because more often than not the language is proposed and included in contracts by parties with sophisticated corporate defense lawyers on their side and people have to sign these documents when they have very little or no bargaining power. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:17 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
On the contrary, Kennedy authored many decisions that enhanced the power of businesses, including the court’s decision giving corporations First Amendment free speech protection in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
-NAP exhibits all of the weaknesses and missed opportunities that has marked the NAP process for many developed states: it focuses on outward conduct and pays little attention to the human rights effects of economic activity within the United States; it is grounded in the prerogatives of executive command; it provides little assessment of the legal and remedial framework of the United States and its relationship to managing business conduct; and most regrettably,… [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 3:19 am
Lehmann: Locating Financial Loss and Collective Actions in Case of Defective Investor Information: The CJEU’s Judgment in VEB v BP For the first time, the CJEU has ruled in VEB v BP on the court competent for deciding liability suits regarding misinformation on the secondary securities market. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
The argument is made both on a theoretical level and by a review of a specific issue in international investment law, namely, the development of wider types of claims and the rise of so-called “treaty shopping” by means of corporate group structuring. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
These cases and other matters from the last month are discussed in greater detail after the jump.The SEC v. [read post]
