Search for: "Logan v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
  And TV presenter Gabby Logan has “hit back at internet lies that she had an affair with colleague Alan Shearer” – and stating that she had never obtained an injunction (see the Daily Mail report). [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am by Eugene Volokh
The United States Supreme Court is regularly subjected to such arguments, especially from amici (including foreign government amici). [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:45 am by Susan Brenner
 While in the United States, [Diamreyan] made no effort to obtain legitimate employment or to advance his education; instead, he continued his involvement in the scheme to defraud.Brief for the United States of America, U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am by Don Cruse
STATE OF TEXAS, No. 14-0226 Disposed on orders list of May 8, 2015 CITY OF DALLAS v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
She would have held that the Oregon Supreme Court had faithfully applied Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by INFORRM
United States Influencer Logan Paul has filed a defamation lawsuit against Stephen Findeisen, better known as “Coffeezilla” on YouTube, over videos he produced about Paul’s failed CryptoZoo non-fungible token (NFT) project in 2022. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:45 pm by Russell Knight
The Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution requires that everyone get proper notice of any court action. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:45 pm by Russell Knight
The Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution requires that everyone get proper notice of any court action. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Google is expected to pay a multimillion dollar penalty from the Federal Trade Commission over its handling of kids’ information on its popular video site YouTube. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]