Search for: "Long v. District Court"
Results 141 - 160
of 22,166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2019, 9:53 am
The district court proceeded to weigh the interests of the parties. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:43 pm
In the first of two opinions issued by that Court today, the Court considered, in UPS v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 4:38 pm
"[A] district court's failure to make Santiago findings will not be reversible error so long as the evidence in the trial record would support such findings. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
The district court held that a six-year time bar on the action was jurisdictional and that the Herr had waited too long to file this lawsuit. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:15 pm
But the question likely at issue for most practitioners in reviewing the case is "When is the district court's determination considered 'final'?" [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 1:15 pm
Busby v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
The court held that the Supreme Court's Marsh v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 2:29 pm
The case is Prairie Rheumatology Associates, S.C. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 10:40 pm
In A.A. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 8:14 pm
Town of Southampton, (ED NY, Sept. 24, 2014), is the latest decision by a New York federal district court in challenges to the refusal by Long Island towns to permit a Jewish organization to construct an eruv. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
The Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York recently decided that a licensing agreement between a television broadcast company and the owner of an animated children’s television series was fully integrated, despite a provision in the agreement which stated that the parties would execute a more detailed long form agreement in the future. 4Kids Entm’t, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 11:45 pm
” Court’s Decision in Gaffney v Cummings The Supreme Court reversed. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:08 am
Here’s the decision; here is my prior post concerning the district court decision. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 8:45 am
Becton Dickinson, the district court has concluded that Patent No. 5,820,551 is unenforceable due to inequitable conduct under the higher standards for intent and materiality articulated by the en banc court. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:04 am
In Weitzner v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:43 am
Supreme Court issued a divided decision in the long-awaited takings case of Koontz v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm
is a recent pain pump case in front of the United States District Court of Colorado. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
HomeAway won that case (both in the district court and appellate court), and the district court opinion relied heavily on Section 230 to wipe out most of the plaintiffs’ claims. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:39 pm
With little explanation, the Ninth Circuit today affirmed the district court’s decision dismissing our landmark challenge to the US government’s mass communications surveillance, Jewel v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:28 am
The Utah Court of Appeals recently issued its decision in the case of Washington County Water Conservancy District v. [read post]
