Search for: "Long v. Lane Co." Results 141 - 160 of 172
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm by Larry Downes
  No ISP offers the premium or “fast lane” service to individual applications. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am by NL
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am by NL
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
With all those caveats, in this brutally long post, I try to address the most significant questions that come before the Supreme Court, with an eye to the issues on which the Stevens retirement could realistically produce a material change in the law. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 1:05 pm by Erin Miller
  When the Court abruptly changed its mind in 1989, effectively eviscerating the Griggs standard in Wards Cove Packing Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:51 am by Beck, et al.
As long-time readers know, this blog was founded by a couple of guys who first got to know each other defending co-defendant manufacturers in the Orthopedic Bone Screw Mass Tort. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
See Williams, 549 U.S. at 343, 356-57; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:39 am
  In State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
. * 270 BC: Philitas of Cos, Greek intellectual, is said by Athenaeus of Naucratis to have studied false arguments and erroneous word-usage so intensely that he wasted away and starved to death. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 12:02 pm by David G. Badertscher
This right of business access, by itself, would not have given Lawicki the power to consent to entry into the home, but combined with Lawicki's long-term and continuing residence at Gillette Lane, Lawicki had a sufficient relationship to the home to have actual authority to permit the search.Citation: U.S. v. [read post]