Search for: "Long v. Long" Results 141 - 160 of 73,218
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 2:55 am by Rose Hughes
In this field, the prior art will often be long lists of possible indications included in prior publications, all of which lack supporting evidence. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am by Russell Knight
Ingram, 2015 IL App (1st) 142439 (10 ½ month delay); Long v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Schweber and Anderson explain that under the test established in Brandenburg v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm by Josh Blackman
If something has been done for a long time, that is a good enough reason to keep doing it. [read post]
17 May 2024, 10:46 am by John McFarland
This is another in a long line of cases in which the Court relies on its flawed reasoning in Heritage Resources v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
CFPB Survives Another Attack Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Michael Chatzipanagiotis
In its judgment in C-173/23 Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU ECLI:EU:C:2024:295 (Judgment), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled on some aspects of the duty of national courts to assess of their own motion the unfairness of contractual terms in the context of air carriage under the 1999 Montreal Convention on the liability of the international air carrier (MC99). [read post]
16 May 2024, 4:02 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  Hospitals can face potentially multi-million-dollar settlements and significant long-term compliance costs. [read post]
16 May 2024, 1:24 pm by bklemm@foley.com
Members of the ESOP industry have long called for rules clearly defining what “adequate consideration” means in the context of an exemption to ERISA’s strict rules prohibiting transactions between parties in interest. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:46 am by Dan Farber
Putting together this list highlighted a decades-long duel between two Justices, Antonin Scalia and John Paul Stevens. [read post]