Search for: "Lord v. Collins" Results 141 - 160 of 220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am by charonqc
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
  This is reinforced by inter alia  the decision of the English and Welsh Court of Appeal, per Lord Justice Longmore, in Fiona Trust and Holding Corp & Ors v Skarga & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 275. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Damian Collins MP has explained why the Online Safety Bill can rebalance the relationship between Big Tech and journalism to the Press Gazette. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
His passion and enthusiasm for his subject caused him to, so to speak, “lose the run of himself” [20] The Handyside freedom of expression test, as applied by Lord Bingham in Director of Public Prosecution v Collins [2006], was whether the defendant, in exercising his right to say things or express opinions which offended, shocked or disturbed one or more sectors of the population, use language which was “BEYOND THE PALE” of what was… [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Audrey Ah-Kan, Olswang
The Supreme Court hearing is to take place on Wednesday 13 and Thursday 14 July 2011 and will be heard by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins of Mapesbury and Lord Clarke. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
In DPP v Collins [2006] UKHL 40, Lord Bingham said at [9] that “There can be no yardstick of gross offensiveness otherwise than by the application of reasonably enlightened, but not perfectionist, contemporary standards to the particular message sent in its particular context. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Journalist Lauren Collins interviewed editor Paul Dacre (“he still doesn’t have a computer in his office“) and Mail Online editor Martin Clarke. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Riley v Sivier, heard 11 December 2020 (Collins-Rice J). [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Notwithstanding potential opposition to the plan in the House of Lords, abolition of Section 40 could spell the formal end of the state-backed press regulation system envisaged by the Leveson report. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:15 am
Listening to the well-rehearsed arguments will be Lords Walker and Collins and Lady Hale.Anti Copying in Design -- better known as ACID -- has just released its latest newsletter. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts Between 27 November and 1 December 2023, Collins Rice J continued to hear the trial in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
  The judgment was given by Lord Reed NPJ. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:45 am by Chukwuma Okoli
In the context of English law, Lord Collins relied on the business efficacy and officious bystander analogy to imply jurisdiction agreements in Vizcaya. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J heard an application for a stay in case of Barron v Collins – the libel claim by three Labour MPs against a UKIP MEP. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The National Security Bill was read for the first time in the House of Lords. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 22 and 23 January 2024, Collins Rice J heard the trial of Nagi v Sinniah Santhiramoulesan QB-2021-002658. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
  On the same date HHJ Parkes reserved judgment in the case of Woodrow v Johansson On 20 January 2012, the Administrative Court handed down judgment in the R (Associated Newspapers) v Lord Justice Leveson ([2012] EWHC 57 (Admin)). [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
[Update 2] The decision, made on 30 November 2010 by Lords Hope, Brown and Mance, can be found on the list on the Supreme Court website. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm by Giles Peaker
As Collins J said in R v Newham LBC ex parte Begum the court will not unreasonably enforce the duty. [read post]