Search for: "Lord v. Lord"
Results 141 - 160
of 6,611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
In accepting this justification for deference, the court was in this regard ostensibly influenced by the British House of Lords judgment in R (on the application of ProLife Alliance) v British Broadcasting Corporation. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:03 pm
For example, in the 1914 case Harris v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
In the recent UK Supreme Court decision O (a minor), R (on the application of v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKSC 3, Lord Hodge provided a pithy statement of the approach of the courts in that jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 1:32 am
Rabiat Akande & Faisal Bhabha, Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper: Insulating the Church: Ethiopian Orthodox Church of Canada v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 2:52 am
Amgen v Sanofi, IPKat). [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 8:20 am
Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill was read the third time in the House of Lords on Thursday. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:06 pm
It is difficult to align the interpretation of G 2/21 by Lord Justice Arnold in Sandoz v BMS with the Board of Appeal decision in T 0116/18 reported in the minutes of oral proceedings. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
As I read an appellate opinion about the illegal public adjuster contract, which went viral a day later,1 I kept thinking about how this entire scenario could easily have been avoided. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:17 pm
In S.B.B. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:06 am
This is the final part of this Kat’s analysis on Interdigital v Lenovo FRAND judgment [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am
You can also read the essays of the runners-up here. 2023 Winning Essay byAlexis Boddy In a judgment by the House of Lords in 2003, Lord Hoffman discussed the importance of individual human rights in democratic societies. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 7:19 pm
Here's the abstract: Audre Lorde wrote a text in 1979 to which she gave the title: ‘The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House’. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:04 pm
In Addington v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 2:50 pm
From Tomlinson v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
[ii] But one also speaks to the relationship between a domus and its dominus—its lord, master, owner, or overseer (perhaps captured by the old term 掌握 (Zhǎngwò) with its sense of also understanding things and making use of them). [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 8:28 am
Resurrection Temple of Our Lord, Inc ., 213 A.D.3d 735, 184 N.Y.S.3d 96 (2d Dept. 2023)]. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
One such decision was that in Mimo Connect v Buley & Ors, which ended up in the Court of Appeal a month ago with the decision of Lord Justice Bean (giving Judgment of the Court) handed down two weeks ago ([2023] EWCA Civ 909).BackgroundAs she said in the last post, trade secrets cases are full of facts, so buckle in. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:55 pm
The case is Esper v NHS North West London Integrated Care Board [2023] EWCOP 29; [2023] WLR(D) 300, and is a decision of Mr Justice Poole. [read post]
