Search for: "Lord v. Smith"
Results 141 - 160
of 468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2011, 6:48 am
The appeal was heard and will be considered by Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:18 pm
And then I also wanted to reflect Mr Justice Smith's case management plans. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
The impugned statements fell squarely within the type of material identified in Myerson v Smith’s Weekly Publishing Co. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
Yesterday the Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
After Mr Harris had provided a review of the facts, he handed over to Richard Miller QC, who started by drawing attention to previous House of Lord decisions (Mulkerrin’s [2003] 1 WLR 1937 (HL); Vervaeke v Smith [1983] AC 145) in which the Court held that res judicata is a form of estoppel that should apply “even though the decision may be wrong”. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 3:33 am
Smith. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
In doing so it acknowledged that the addition of Art. 2 had all the hallmarks of a compromise about it, and that “complete consistency of approach” between different national courts of the EPC states “is not a feasible or realistic possibility at the moment”, but nonetheless “it is sensible for national courts at least to learn from each other and to seek to move towards, rather than away from, each other’s approaches”, quoting from its own judgment in… [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
The House of Lords begins the Committee Stage of the Data Protection Bill on 30 October 2017. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
Partially allowing the appeal, a Court of Appeal panel of Smith LJ, Leveson LJ and Sir Mark Waller once again dismissed the application for summary judgment on procedural grounds but found against the claimants on the points on limitation. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
Just the previous week Lord Justice Floyd, who gave the leading judgment in this decision, gave the Herschel Smith Lecture. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:51 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faith Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 907 (29 July 2011) Suckrajh, R (on the application of) v The Asylum & Immigration Tribunal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 938 (29 July 2011) Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900 (29 July 2011) Hayes v Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (29 July 2011) Austin & Ors v Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 928 (29 July 2011) Modi & Anor… [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:50 am
Prompted by the existence of the Lords Communications and Digital Committee Inquiry into Freedom of Expression Online, this piece aims – without any great expectation of success – to dispel some of the fog. [read post]
10 May 2018, 11:12 pm
Hill & Smith [1982] RPC 183; Improver Corporation v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
Part II of the Yearbook contains a symposium of five articles on ‘Private Law in the UK Supreme Court’ from leading commentators, including two preeminent former Law Lords in private law, Lord Hoffmann and Lord Millett. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm
” Eighteen months later Lord Phillips, giving the judgment of the whole Court of Appeal in Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd, said the opposite: “Thus copyright is antithetical to freedom of expression. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:35 am
Lord Macnaughton famously observed in IRC v Muller and Co’s Margarine [1901]: What is goodwill? [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
There were two pieces of prior art over which the patents were claimed to be obvious: the first was a paper referred to as Parmley & Smith, and the second was a conference paper delivered by Professor Smith (of Parmley & Smith fame) in Banbury. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:45 am
“This is something that could be powerful,” said Abhijit V. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
In Courtroom 2, on Thursday 16 June 2011, the case of R v Smith will be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins and Lord Wilson. [read post]
