Search for: "Los Angeles v. David" Results 141 - 160 of 1,195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2019, 8:00 pm by Howard Bashman
Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that “Justice Kavanaugh may hold swing vote on partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:32 pm by James Bickford
”  But to David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, the Justices “sounded as though they are inclined to set a limit to the free-speech rule to permit lawsuits against those who target ordinary citizens with especially personal and hurtful attacks. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm by Andrew Hamm
Phelps at Los Angeles Times, Susan Ferrechio at Washington Examiner, Ryan J. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 8:48 am
In the Los Angeles Times, Henry Weinstein has a preview, "Jury under justices' scrutiny. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 6:44 am
Garcia is accused of first-degree murder in the April 29, 2002 shooting of Los Angeles County sheriff's Deputy David March; Deputy March was shot to death during a traffic stop, and Mr. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
  In Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports on the “alliance” between two Justices from California:  Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 8:23 pm
The lawyer for Kevin Cogill, the Los Angeles man charged with uploading nine unreleased Guns N' Roses tracks from the upcoming Chinese Democracyalbum, said Thursday his client's plea deal with prosecutors does not require any prison time. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:32 pm
Wednesday's edition of The Los Angeles Times will contain an article headlined "Sotomayor, senators make nice -- for now; The Supreme Court nominee talks race and the law in meetings with lawmakers; Sen. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:36 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
by Kevin Jon Heller The following is a guest-post by David Glazier, Associate Professor of Law at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
A 60-year-old Los Angeles, Calif., attorney was a passenger in the back seat of the taxicab driven by the defendant Abdulkhair Haq on June 28, 2013. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:57 am
Supreme Court for the Los Angeles Times, writing in the July 2008 issue of the ABA Journal. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:42 pm by Howard Bashman
Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that “Supreme Court rules for faith-based pregnancy centers, blocks California disclosure law. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:27 pm by Howard Bashman
Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that “Supreme Court appears set to overturn Mississippi murder case based on racial bias. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:19 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston previewed the case for this blog; other coverage comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, and law student Ben Einhouse for Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:27 am
However, the Los Angeles County foreclosure defense lawyers at Howard Law, P.C., have seen a promising trend toward stricter requirements for foreclosing entities. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:37 pm
" Some more previews in the press: David Savage, Los Angeles Times, On the Supreme Court docket: bleeeeeep, "At issue is the future indecency standard for television and radio. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:02 am by Stewart Baker
Today’s forecast: Windy with a high probability of litigation as Los Angeles sues The Weather Company for collecting and sharing location information in its apps. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:16 pm by Stewart Baker
Today's forecast: Windy with a high probability of litigation as Los Angeles sues The Weather Company for collecting and sharing location information in its apps. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
  In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage looks at how the cases might play out at the Court and observes that last fall’s order allowing several decisions striking down state bans to stand and thereby “clearing the way for gay marriages to begin in at least 35 states . . . was seen as a signal that the ultimate decision had been made, even if the justices had yet to formulate an opinion to explain the result. [read post]