Search for: "Lovell v. Lovell"
Results 141 - 160
of 362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2012, 1:25 pm
Catherine Stetson of Hogans Lovells handled the most recent appeals with Stouck on the briefs. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 2:30 am
Other rounds included numbers (v tricky!) [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 11:12 am
Monaco, Henry Bunsow, Hogan Lovells, Ilan Nissan, Ilan S. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
Neal Katyal of Hogan Lovells, the former Solicitor General and premier appellate litigator. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
Ada Nourell (Hogan Lovells) was on hand and delivered an excellent, prompt report on the evening's events (but you know Kats, they do things in their own time....). [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 4:37 pm
In Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:51 pm
Samsung and Oracle v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 3:55 pm
Klaas Bisschop and Ruud van der Velden (Lovells) write about a recent Dutch case in which, despite the ECJ's pronouncements in GAT/LuK and Roche/Primus, cross-border relief was still granted [IPKat note: you can get a short version of this, by Klaas, from this month's excellent Lovells IP Newsletter]. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
The celebration of two decades of the House of Lords patent biopatent ruling in Biogen v Medeva, hosted by Rouse, is happily recorded on PatLit by Rouseniks Mary Smillie and Catriona Smith. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 9:28 pm
The IPCom v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 6:14 am
Polukoff v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:07 am
Katyal has argued twenty-four cases before the Court, including his first case, Hamdan v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:58 am
Katyal has argued twenty-four cases before the Court, including his first case, Hamdan v. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 8:20 am
Katyal has argued twenty-four cases before the Court, including his first case, Hamdan v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 8:14 am
The biggest news from today's Nokia v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:58 am
That said, a breach of contract claim premised upon the assertion that the “defendants overbilled … and performed unnecessary services … is not duplicative of the legal malpractice claim” (Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
Like the Eleventh Circuit in Glasser v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:33 am
I've become expert at some strange topics during my time here, including slurry separators (Farmers Build -v- Carrier) and mortuary equipment. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 8:58 am
V. [read post]
