Search for: "Low v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC." Results 141 - 160 of 311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am by David Kopel
The 2nd Circuit cited but did not follow the Supreme Court’s City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Modification of USPTO Claim Construction: It is proposed that the USPTO apply the same claim construction and, more importantly, presumption of validity as applied in the district courts in IPR, PGR and CBM proceedings.Impact on Abusive Litigation Practices: Helps TrollsLikelihood of Becoming Law: Low – Application of presumption of validity to USPTO post grant proceedings is a non-starter. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by stevemehta
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. [read post]
7 May 2008, 11:28 am
To do that, I want to use a recent decision of the Second District of the Ohio Court of Appeals: State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 9:11 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
This is why many home improvement stores (Home Depot, Lowe’s Home Improvement, U-Haul, etc.) here in West Palm Beach offer tool and equipment rentals. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 9:54 am
Additionally, are there particular market facts and circumstances where the approach established by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Polygram Holding, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
" Id. at 867 (quoting district court).The same thing happened in Stahl v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:46 am
The emotional distress inflicted by your clients' litigation -- filed in Sacramento rather than the Fresno Branch of the Eastern District Court where my clients' live in violation of the Rules of Court -- has been extreme. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am by msatta
The final acknowledgment of the “long way” plea bargaining has come came bluntly in the Supreme Court’s 2012 decision in Missouri v. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:08 pm by Giles Peaker
Following R (Jakimaviciute) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2014] EWCA Civ 1438 [our report] and Alemi, R (on the application of) v Westminster City Council [2015] EWHC 1765 (Admin) [our report], it was not permissible to set qualifying [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
  Indeed, the federal government only challenged six of its provisions, four of which the district court (now affirmed on appeal) enjoined. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 9:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ford, ProCD: Tidying Up After the Stranger on the Street Epstein thinks the district court’s decision in ProCD was doctrinalist while Easterbrook’s court of appeals opinion was properly functionalist. [read post]