Search for: "M. B., individually" Results 141 - 160 of 6,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2024, 5:30 am by Michael Mercurio, Esq.
As I have been telling my clients, now is the time to choose a path: a) get ready to sell your business as soon as possible, or b) prepare to keep running it through the next few years. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 11:34 pm by Jeff Gamso
  It was a few years ago, and at the time, Ohio's system worked like this (I'm omitting lots of detail):Put shunts in guy's arms.Pump thiopental.Pump pancuronium bromide.Pump potassium chloride.Have body carted away.What Ohio didn't have was a fallback position, a backup, a Plan B. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:17 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
m. 114-187 ¿Qué va a pasar con la deuda de Puerto Rico? [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 11:35 am
But for now, I'm inclined to agree with the perspective of Tim Jost. [read post]
One threat it seems the FTC is now making good on is the use of the FTC’s long dormant Penalty Offense Authority, found in Section 5(m)(1)(B) of the Act. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 6:06 am by David Fraser
If this case were to arise under the federal statute, I'm not sure the OPC would be able to find jurisdiction.Here is the summary of the decision prepared by the OIPC:Two individuals complained that an organization improperly collected, used and disclosed their personal information. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:16 am by Steve Lombardi
Okay today is bitch and moan day at the Edict and I’m choosing wrong-site, wrong-procedure and wrong-patient surgeries to B&M about, but in a constructive way. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:44 pm by Marco Rossi
   Arguably, sub paragraphs 6(a) and 6(b) of article 3 should apply separately, depending on whether the "customer" to be tested is a corporate entity (in which case, the test of sub paragraph a) should apply) or a trust or other similar arrangement (in which case the test of sub paragraph b) should apply). [read post]