Search for: "MATTER OF D R B"
Results 141 - 160
of 5,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2021, 8:54 am
” This question matters because D&O insurance provides coverage for the corporate entity (as opposed to the insured directors and officers) only for “Securities Claims” as that term is defined in the policy. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
This implies that what is not defined by the Implementing Regulations does not qualify as a procedural defect in the sense of A 112a(2)(d). [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm
Ds shouldn’t need to repeat known failures in their R&D. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:35 am
R. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:52 pm
The traditional D&O insurance policies have three insuring agreements, denominated Side A, Side B, and Side C. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:18 am
See also Family Ct Act § 417.In Matter of Maria-Irene D. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 4:04 am
Source: WKL&B Editorial Staff [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:01 am
Hogue, Tyler R. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:52 am
(b) Votes Required for Approval of Bond Issues and Budget- Section 5(d) of such Act (sec. 9-904(d), D.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
Domestic Relations Law § 240 (1-b), subdivisions (d) (g) and (i) were amended accordingly. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 4:13 pm
I'd start with Charles R. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
This applies all the more if the unclear feature is essential with respect to the invention in the sense that it is designed for delimiting the subject-matter claimed from the prior art, thereby giving rise to uncertainty as to whether or not the subject-matter claimed is anticipated. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:12 am
JOSEPH R. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 5:39 pm
TunneyThe case of R. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
The result of this invidious doctrine, as formulated in Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168, meant that “if two people set out to commit an offence (crime A), and in the course of that joint enterprise, one of them (D1) commits another offence (crime B), the second person (D2) is guilty as an accessory to crime B if he has foreseen the possibility that D1 might act as he did. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 5:48 am
In Matter of Gariel v Morse, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2016 WL 7469484 (Mem), 2016 N.Y. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 8:54 am
R. 4714 To amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for the National Transportation Safety Board for fiscal years 2011 through 2014, and for other purposes. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:55 am
PharMerica Corp., December 16, 2015, Selya, B.). [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:49 am
Therefore, B&D has failed to establish that it was not negligent as a matter of law. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 10:24 am
The tenancy pre-dated the changes to the 1985 Housing Act brought in by the Localism Act 2011 on 1/4/2012, which meant that because Ms T and Mr D were an unmarried couple, s.87(b) applied to Ms T's application. [read post]
