Search for: "MATTER OF D V"
Results 141 - 160
of 22,869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2016, 7:09 am
San Juan County (D. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
Nokia Oyj (Nokia Corpn) v IPCom GmbH & Co KG: [2011] EWHC 2719 (Pat); [2011] WLR (D) 303 “Section 63(2) of the Patents Act 1977 was not intended to act as a sanction against careless drafting or lack of good faith when those matters had no bearing on the damages or other remedy sought by the patentee.” WLR Daily, 26th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:14 am
Ryanair Holdings Ltd v Office of Fair Trading and another; [2011] EWCA Civ 1579; [2011] WLR (D) 392 “The Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules granted a power to suspend the running of time, with regard to an investigation by the OFT, as a matter of urgency and in order to protect the public interest.” WLR Daily, 21st December 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 4:47 am
Folien Fischer AG and another v Ritrama SpA (Case C-133/11); [2012] WLR (D) 292 “An action for a negative declaration seeking to establish the absence of liability in tort, delict, or quasi-delict fell within the scope of article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L12, p 1).” WLR Daily, 25th October 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:11 am
Football Dataco Ltd and Others v Yahoo! [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 2:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:53 am
Arif v Zar and another [2012] EWCA Civ 986; [2012] WLR (D) 239 “In relation to a bankruptcy order, the court sitting in bankruptcy had to give consideration to the possibility that a person might attempt to use the protection of the order as a shield against the claims of their spouse for ancillary relief. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:22 am
Regina v Brewster [2010] EWCA Crim 1194; [2010] WLR (D) 159 “Where a party sought to admit evidence of a witness’s bad character which bore only indirectly on his credibility, and that credibility was a matter in issue in the proceedings and of substantial importance in the context of the case as a whole, such evidence was only admissible pursuant to s 100(1)(b) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 as evidence of substantial probative value on the issue of… [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 6:46 am
" TriDim Innovations LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 9:32 pm
Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd. were not invalid for being patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:59 pm
District Court for the District of Nevada issued an Order in a case captioned Global Cash Access, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 9:43 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- Last month, in Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. 10X Genomics, Inc., District Judge Richard G. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- Last month, in Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 10:32 pm
Per U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 6:16 am
In Does Revlon Matter: An Empirical and Theoretical Study, we examine the effect the seminal case of Revlon v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
(People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:59 pm
Vikram D. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:10 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 12-0017, 2012 MT 245, PETE HORN and ELVA HORN, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:06 pm
By Justin D. [read post]
