Search for: "MATTER OF H C R"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2009, 1:06 am
The publisher was diligent in trying to verify the allegation, having regard to: (a) the seriousness of the allegation; (b) the public importance of the matter; (c) the urgency of the matter; (d) the status and reliability of the source; (e) whether the plaintiff's side of the story was sought and accurately reported; (f) whether the inclusion of the defamatory statement was… [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am
(English MT translation by Deepl.)Eine Rückzahlungsmöglichkeit der Beschwerdegebühr gemäß Regel 103 (4) c) EPÜ kann es auch dann geben, wenn ein Antrag auf mündliche Verhandlung nicht vom Beschwerdeführer zurückgenommen wurde, sondern von einem anderen Verfahrensbeteiligten, der keine Beschwerde eingelegt hat (siehe Nrn. 8.3 - 8.9 der Entscheidungsgründe).The decision is in German. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
[…] [34] The claims shall define the matter for which protection is sought in terms of the technical features of the invention (R 43(1)). [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:21 am
The Supreme Court appointed Vicki C. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Professional representatives are subject to the disciplinary power exercised by the Institute of Professional Representatives (epi) or the EPO (A 134a(1)(c)) whereas the disciplinary power to which legal practitioners are subject is a matter of national law and is exercised by national organisations or offices. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:02 am
h. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
§ 205.1(a)(3)(i)(C)(2), an I-130 petition is automatically revoked upon the death of the petitioner, unless: USCIS determines, as a matter of discretion exercised for humanitarian reasons in light of the facts of a particular case, that it is inappropriate to revoke the approval of the petition. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
§ 205.1(a)(3)(i)(C)(2), an I-130 petition is automatically revoked upon the death of the petitioner, unless: USCIS determines, as a matter of discretion exercised for humanitarian reasons in light of the facts of a particular case, that it is inappropriate to revoke the approval of the petition. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:40 pm
Matter of J-H-J-, 26 I&N Dec. 563 (BIA 2015); The Board held that only aliens who originally entered the United States as lawful permanent residents (with an immigrant visa) are barred from INA § 212(h) relief for a prior aggravated felony conviction. [read post]
12 May 2011, 4:56 am
Anyone can probate their own matter but sometimes a qualified and experienced probate attorney can be indispensable in order to save time, avoid mistakes and bring about the desired results. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 5:27 pm
See, Matter of H-R-, 7 I. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
R. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm
H & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Ealing London Borough Council [2016] EWHC 841 (Admin) Ealing’s allocation policy has already had lawfulness problems, compounded by Ealing’s unlawful refusal to do anything about that unlawfulness. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:35 am
Justice Brown felt that he could not hear the matter without greater particularization of the accounts. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 4:08 am
H. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
Here is what the Board had to say on the alleged inadmissible extension:[2.1.1] The sole objection raised under A 100(c) concerned the question of whether or not the amendments of the structural formulae representing oxazoline derivatives, found to be allowable under R 88 EPC 1973 (now R 139 EPC 2000) during examination proceedings, introduced subject-matter extending beyond the content of the application as filed. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:35 am
Salmon, Jr.The Rt Rev’d Peter H. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
R (on the application of HH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, R (on the application of PH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa, BH (AP) and another v The Lord Advocate and another (Scotland), KAS or H (AP) v The Lord Advocate and another (Scotland) and Genoa Filipek-Kwasny v Polish Judicial Authority, heard 5 – 8 March 2012. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:05 am
According to the Board of Appeal, there is long-established case law interpreting Art. 84 EPC as requiring the entirety of the description to be consistent with the allowable claims (T 0977/94, r. 6.1; T 0300/04, r. 5; T 1808/06, r. 2). [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:50 am
The latest issue of the „Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax)“ features the following articles: R. [read post]
