Search for: "MATTER OF K A B" Results 141 - 160 of 2,702
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Any disclosure in the description inconsistent with the amended subject-matter should normally be excised. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm by Holden Oliver (Kitzbühel Desk)
Chapter K of Jay Foonberg's book, How To Get and Keep Good Clients says that you should bombard the client with everything written concerning your firm or the client's matters. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The ED denied the novelty of the subject-matter of claim 1 over the disclosure in document D1, a document relevant under A 54(3). [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Like B and C, the humans too began attending to other matters. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Kristi L. Wolff
In determining “whether any advertising concerning a food or food product is false or misleading,” courts must also consider factors including—but not limited to—the following: “(a) subject matter; (b) visual content; (c) use of animated characters or child-oriented activities and incentives; (d) music or other audio content; (e) age of models; (f) presence of child celebrities or celebrities who appeal to children; (g) language; (h) competent and… [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 5:02 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Exclusion K precludes coverage under the policy for claims “[b]ased upon, arising out of, or in any way involving … the actual, alleged or attempted purchase or sale, or offer or solicitation of an offer to purchase or see, any debt or equity securities[.] [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The board also failed to ask why we believed that the Auxiliary Request A and B would overcome any of the objections. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 6:06 am by S. Dean Michaux, JD
Defendant’s answer contained a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim because the 401(k) and Pension Plan were divided under September 24, 2012 QDROs. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The feature should allow to distinguish [the claimed subject-matter] from spheres or polyhedral shapes derived from spheres, which have no such circumferential face. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 11:40 am
  The Court found that this claim failed under both Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and Rule 12(b)(6). [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The method as claimed was regarded as a mix of technical features (step A) and non-technical features relying on the performance of mental activities based on the application of mathematical methods (steps B to E), the latter features being argued by the patentee to be core features of the invention. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
(b) No reference is made in D1 to the mask subtraction step. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Thus, the opposition ground according to A 100(c) would not hold against the subject-matter of claim 1 disclosing said amendment. [read post]