Search for: "MATTER OF M R W" Results 141 - 160 of 1,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:11 am by David Lat
If you go to the address in the ad, www.ericeinisman.com, you’re taken to résumé of Eric B. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of an application by Siobhan McLaughlin for Judicial Review (NI), heard 30 Apr 2018. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The law has nothing to do with the effectiveness of those systems, especially w/r/t the general public. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:37 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Im vorangegangenen Einspruchs­verfahren wurde E12 verspätet eingereicht und letztlich während der mündlichen Verhandlung vor der Einspruchs­abteilung von dieser ins Verfahren zugelassen. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:58 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
I think he’s funny, even though he beat me in a moot (I’m not bitter or anything). [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:06 pm by Jeralyn
I'm still working through the discovery in the George Zimmerman case. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 6:06 am
Taxpayer asks: I’m a recent college grad working 2 full-time jobs and doing some free-lance work on the side. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am by Sander van Rijnswou
(English MT translation by Deepl.)Eine Rückzahlungsmöglichkeit der Beschwerdegebühr gemäß Regel 103 (4) c) EPÜ kann es auch dann geben, wenn ein Antrag auf mündliche Verhandlung nicht vom Beschwerdeführer zurückgenommen wurde, sondern von einem anderen Verfahrensbeteiligten, der keine Beschwerde eingelegt hat (siehe Nrn. 8.3 - 8.9 der Entscheidungsgründe).The decision is in German. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:10 am by Nico Cordes
After T 910/03 it languished but occasionally reappeared.The Board refrains from referring the matter to the EBoA as it considers such referral not to be decisive in the present case, since according to the Board a same conclusion would be reached using both the essentiality test and the gold standard (being that the removal violates Art. 76(1) EPC).Entscheidungsgründe(...)2. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 19 June, the Supreme Court will hear the appeals of R v M; R v C; R v T. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 10:52 am
Barack Obama and countless other successful individuals have used a little blow at some point in their lives (W can't remember). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
One with a great website, pictures of the beautiful decor, private rooms and a great wine list, ability to make reservations online, and testimonials from customers like Julie R. and Bob W. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:39 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Thus, this decision is in no way a matter of a debit order submitted without comment, which the Board of Appeal considered an implicit request for correction. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Does interference w/TM interests matter any more than other deception? [read post]