Search for: "MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers"
Results 141 - 160
of 21,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2020, 6:10 am
If passed, the proposed measure would give the attorney general independent authority on those matters. [read post]
5 May 2013, 1:56 pm
Agency v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 12:37 pm
In Ellis v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 8:24 am
My power of attorney allows me to represent my mother’s interest in all matters. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 9:58 pm
Spitzer is horrified by the case that became DC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:36 pm
Moreover, the article acknowledges that in Clinton v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:05 pm
In Clayton v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 9:11 am
Here is the opinion in Standing Bear v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:48 am
But today it came back to life, with the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Big Brother Watch and others v UK. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:16 am
In the recent case (Tran v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 6:53 am
However, this issue had not been addressed by the New York courts until last Friday when the Fourth Department was confronted by the question in Matter of Bobbijean P. v Stephanie P., 2007 NY Slip Op 07173. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
They described how, today, administrative agencies “as a practical matter . . . exercise legislative power, . . . executive power . . . and judicial power. . . [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 10:37 pm
(3) Limited expansiveness: the treaty power is unconstrained by other powers but subject to internal limits, such as subject matter. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:12 am
Power Integrations, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:58 am
He specifically noted that congressional power extends to such matters as treatment of prisoners and interrogation methods. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:37 am
Regina (A) v Director of Establishments of the Security Service Court of Appeal “The Administrative Court did not have jurisdiction to entertain a claim that a public authority proposed to act in a way incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights where the matters brought up were within the purview of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. [read post]
19 May 2021, 7:19 am
Sanford and Korematsu v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 5:27 pm
It does not deal with matters of substance discussed at the meeting. [read post]
