Search for: "MATTER OF T A G"
Results 141 - 160
of 5,909
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2014, 5:01 pm
This follows from the consideration that - in accordance with R 43(1) – the invention in the European patent application is defined by the subject-matter of a claim, i.e. the specific combination of features present in the claim, as is reminded in opinion G 2/98 [2] of the Enlarged Board of Appeal. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:01 pm
Furthermore, the Board considers that the OD applied the principle of prima facie relevance correctly in a reasonable manner when exercising its discretional power (G 7/93 [2.6]). [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 3:32 pm
But sensible outsiders don’t do a lot of trading. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
Even so, the subject-matter of claim 1 according to both requests also involves an inventive step.VIII. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 9:16 am
Scientists say they have identified the semi-mythical not to mention mystical G-spot, using ultra-sound. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 10:34 am
In the long run, it will matter more. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
Prokop, who in 2008 was working for Kennametal Technologies and involved in matters relating to inventions in the Kennametal group. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 5:31 pm
Thus it is inadmissible in the appeal proceedings and does not have any legal effect (see T 9/04). [2.3] To read the whole decision, click here. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:43 am
The subject-matter of claim 1 lacked novelty in view of D1. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
Thus, as in the case of the main request, the purpose of the use of the process in claim 1, namely for “improving the stability of the hue”, cannot be regarded as a functional technical feature in the sense of decisions G 2/88 and G 6/88, and hence cannot distinguish the subject-matter of the claim from the prior use. [7.4] Thus, the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 is not novel for the very same reasons that the subject-matter… [read post]
From Eight Days to 105 Days: The Incredible Lengthening of the SBA’s Mentor-Protégé Program Timeline
15 Sep 2021, 7:42 am
Need help with a government contracting legal matter? [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:46 pm
T&G Construction, Inc. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:01 pm
In point (3)(a) of the order it is stated that “Such oral submissions cannot be made as a matter of right, but only with the permission of and under the discretion of the EPO. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:01 pm
In point (3)(a) of the order it is stated that “Such oral submissions cannot be made as a matter of right, but only with the permission of and under the discretion of the EPO. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:07 am
The Enlarged Board must examine the above admissibility requirements with respect to each referred question individually (see, for example, G 3/08 and G 2/19). [read post]
12 May 2015, 3:18 am
Don’t wait until April 2018 – Carry out an audit of your property portfolio. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 11:01 am
Three questions had been referred to the Enlarged Board by interlocutory decision T 1319/04.The claim that triggered the question read as follows:1. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 11:00 am
The recent referral to the Enlarged Board of appeal (EBA) pending as G 1/10 has drawn some attention to the difficulties that may arise when the Examining Division (ED) acts under R 140 during opposition proceedings. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 3:49 pm
And 18 U.S.C. section 922(g)(4) doesn’t just bar a person from buying a firearm after an involuntary commitment. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 4:36 pm
However, since revocation under 3583(g) "is automatic," "[t]here was no need, therefore, for Congress to instruct that the § 3553(a) factors be considered prior to making a decision about mandatory revocation under § 3583(g). [read post]
