Search for: "MEDICAL SOLUTIONS V C CHANGE"
Results 141 - 160
of 280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am
Whitesides (for defendants) and Edward C. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:05 pm
(2) A covered entity must meet the requirements described in paragraph (c), (e), or (f) of this section for uses or disclosures required by law. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:23 am
One filing v. three, we also felt that there were some things left unsaid, in part b/c at the hearings proponents were given a lot of opportunity to explain their cases, so we ran out of time. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
Moreover, according to the defendant's own submissions by reference to Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, it is a principle which enables the court to modify the parties' substantive rights in order to achieve what it regards as a just solution in the particular case I conclude, therefore, that the defendant cannot rely on principles of estoppel to avoid liability in this case. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
****************************** Forget credit card numbers, social security numbers and medical records, law firms are currently under what could become the most significant cyber siege in history. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
His solution is to rid us of private law concepts to become consistent. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:39 am
As said by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:39 am
As said by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
Throughout 2015, Seyfarth Shaw’s dedicated Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes Practice Group hosted a series of CLE webinars that addressed significant issues facing clients today in this important and ever-changing area of law. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:22 am
” C. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 3:04 pm
C, Persona A, and Dr. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
My solution requires a change in the composition of the bench, or a revelation for those on the bench now. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:31 am
Distinguish notice of existence v. notice of scope. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 5:25 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
Employer and other sponsors of non-grandfathered group health plans, their insurers, administrators and fiduciaries should adjust the co-payment, deductible and out of pocket limits applicable for the 2015 plan year to reflect the recent adjustment in the out-of-pocket limits on essential benefits allowed by that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) § 1302(c)(1). [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
§ 227(b)(1)(C). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
Further reduced penalty caps are applicable to submissions for certain 501(c)(3) organizations and for Top Hat and Apprenticeship programs. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am
Employers that sponsor group health plans that violated certain health care reform mandates for claims and appeals imposed by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) will face a duty to pay an excise tax of $100 per violation per day under the expanded Form 8928 filing requirements made applicable to employers providing health plan coverage after 2013 under the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as well undermine the enforceability of claims and appeals decisions under Section 502(b)… [read post]
