Search for: "MGN"
Results 141 - 160
of 542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2012, 7:55 am
There was also one assessement of compensation under the “offer of amends procedure” (KC v MGN). [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:25 pm
There were seven judgments handed down after full trials, only one of which concerned a claim against a mainstream media organisation: Dyson v MGN; Miller v Turner; Crobsie v Ley; Aaronson v Stones; LCG v OVD; Bekoe v Islington; Packham v Wightman and Hay v Cresswell. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:56 am
Tugendhat J first referred back to Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 WLR 1232 where Lord Nicholls established that breach of confidence was better encapsulated by another concept, that of misuse of private information, and commented that the tort, however labelled, “affords respect for one aspect of an individual’s privacy”. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 5:31 am
The top 10 posts of 2016 were as follows (in descending order) Case Law: PJS v News Group Newspapers, Court of Appeal grants privacy injunction – Sara Mansoori and Aidan Wills How to avoid defamation – Steven Price News: Daily Mail loses Human Rights Act challenge to CFA success fees and insurance premiums Defamation Act 2013: A Summary and Overview – Iain Wilson and Max Campbell Media and Information Cases before the Appellate and European Courts in 2016 [Updated3] News:… [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 3:43 am
He appeared in many of the key cases in the development of privacy law, including Campbell v MGN, Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers, Murray v Big Pictures and Mosley v News Group. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 5:02 pm
Decisions on permission are awaited in cases such as Ferdinand v MGN and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group (in both cases, after trials in the Queen’s Bench Division). [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:36 am
The Court was told that 16 or so journalists from all three MGN national newspapers were intercepting Mr Yentob’s voicemails. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 6:21 am
He acted for MGN in the case it took to the European Court of Justice in Strasbourg in which it was held that 100% success fees claimed by Naomi Campbell’s lawyers in relation to her privacy battle with the newspaper group breached the right to freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the Convention. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 4:46 pm
Associated Newspapers – 10 claims Times Newspapers – 4 claims Telegraph Media Group – 3 claims MGN – 1 claim News Group Newspapers – 1 claim (subsequently discontinued). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
John v MGN Ltd (1995): Enclosing the Jury Paddock? [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
This was confirmed by the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
It has been reported that MGN is seeking permission to appeal against the decision of Mann J in Gulati v MGN ([2015] EWHC 1482(Ch)) to award damages in the total sum of £1.2 million to eight victims of phone hacking. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am
The Cearta.ie blog has a post about the impact of MGN v United Kingdom on Irish cases before the Court of Human Rights. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm
This was confirmed by the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm
MGN has yet to plead a response to the allegations. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm
On 15 February 2019 Norris J handed down judgment in the case of Winstone v MGN [2019] EWHC 265 (Ch) [pdf] He held that MGN was not entitled to claim privilege in respect of comments made by the Chairman of Trinity Mirror after an AGM. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm
As already mentioned on 17 December 2015, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Representative Claimants v MGN ([2015] EWCA Civ 1291). [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm
Various Claimants v MGN [2022] EWHC 1222 (Ch) A case concerning the ongoing phone hacking litigation against Mirror Group Newspapers (“MGN”) in which MGN issued and served applications for summary judgment in 23 individual claims. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
The top ten posts of the past 12 months were as follows: Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm How to avoid defamation – Steven Price Defamation Act 2013: A Summary and Overview – Iain Wilson and Max Campbell Case Report: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Libel Trial, Day 3: Claimants closing submissions, judgment reserved Is there is any difference between the public interest and the interest of the public – Brian Cathcart… [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 4:05 pm
The MGN v UK (Campbell) European decision will inevitably mean a reduction in the maximum recoverable success fee, perhaps to 50% instead of 100%, but Jack Straw’s proposal last year (a maximum 10% success fee) was disproportionate and would lead to a return to the bad old days when the libel courts were the sole preserve of the wealthy. [read post]
