Search for: "MONROE v. US " Results 141 - 160 of 703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2007, 4:18 am
Monroe's estate claimed that Shaw Family Archives (SFA), owner of the photos, use of the actress's image violated its rights under Indiana's 1994 Right of Publicity Act. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:09 am by Russ Bensing
  In deciding whether the document was prepared for use at trial, the 8th District in Monroe makes a distinction that the court in Craig did not:  that the autopsy report, unlike the lab certificate at issue in Melendez-Diaz, was not prepared solely for use at trial. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 433 (QB) – see our case comment from Nathan Capone. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 7:42 am by Brian Shiffrin
The Legislature's use of that language, as well as the structure of the statute itself, makes it clear that “incident or transaction” is a broader concept than “act or omission” (see, Penal Law § 70.25[2], [3]; People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
Dept. of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978) (overruling holding of Monroe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Contact us via the Inforrm email: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Although opening his January 17, 2015 opinion in Cornell v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
 Here, the Court reversed the order of Supreme Court, Monroe County Justice Kenneth R. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:39 pm by Michael Lumer
Given the widely held belief in the legal community that a GJ's decision not to indict in cases such as these is usually the result of a rigged or deliberately flawed presentation (see, People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:39 pm by Michael Lumer
Given the widely held belief in the legal community that a GJ's decision not to indict in cases such as these is usually the result of a rigged or deliberately flawed presentation (see, People v. [read post]