Search for: "MOTION TO ALLOW FILING OF NOTICE OF RELATED DOCKET" Results 141 - 160 of 262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am by Vercammen Law
Proceedings related to the Decedent were first pursued in the action encaptioned In the Matter of the Estate of Ralph Sandor, Deceased, Docket No. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
While the Court is required to accept as true the facts alleged in a Motion toVacate if it denies that Motion without an evidentiary hearing, most of the "facts" allegedin the Motion relate to the problems with the Diaz execution. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:05 am by Andrew Frisch
On May 31, 2012, this court issued a Scheduling Order requiring the Plaintiffs to file their motion for conditional certification of the class on or before July 31, 2012 with briefing to be completed by September 10, 2012. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Chris Mirasola, Yishai Schwartz
Noting that compliance errors may “tip the scales” toward invalidation of otherwise acceptable procedures, Judge Hogan considers various compliance issues that had only been the subject of “preliminary notices to the Court. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am by Vercammen Law
" On April 19, 2018, Michael filed a motion seeking an award of attorney's fees and costs from the estate pursuant to Rule 4:42-9(a)(3). [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm by Ken White
As Judge Chen noted in his devasting-to-Prenda ruling today: Under [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] Rule 41, a plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the defendant serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:14 pm by Jeralyn
Today the Government filed a motion to limit Blago's cross-examination of cooperator-in- chief against Rezko, Stuart Levine, on topics related to his excessive drug use, personal social life, an alleged extortion attempt and something that is apparently so tawdry it's blacked out. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 7:21 am by William L. Anderson, Esq.
  Although the creditor is not required to make this application and the SCRA states that it is the duty of the court to make this appointment, courts are unlikely to notice these issues on their own accord due to the size of their dockets. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Marie Louise
Asus Computer International (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Bilski does not invalidate patent claiming ‘electronic payment system’ involving a non-cash ‘spending vehicle’: H&R Block v Jackson Hewitt Tax Service (Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – Apple IP on input devices (IPBiz) Broadcom – ALJ Charneski’s initial determination based on a settlement agreement terminates both enforcement and… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 7:21 am by William L. Anderson, Esq.
  Although the creditor is not required to make this application and the SCRA states that it is the duty of the court to make this appointment, courts are unlikely to notice these issues on their own accord due to the size of their dockets. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 12:11 am
  In a  motion filed Thursday, and made available Friday in Paracha, et al., v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
So the populations of case opinions that can be found in repositories such as Westlaw, Lexis, Casemaker, Justia, or Google Scholar, are not a representative sample of the universe of cases.And as for the precedent-setting cases in the state supreme court, they were and continue to be hand-picked because courts of last resort exercise discretionary review and their active docket (granted petitions are denominated "causes" in the SCOTX lingo) is anything but a random sample. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:02 am by Broc Romanek
The court has not yet set a briefing schedule, nor is there anything on the Court's docket showing that it has received a motion to expedite the briefing schedule. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
A subsequent judge reached the opposite conclusion again while ruling on a motion to dismiss. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 4:03 pm by Kirk Cooper
In the event that a pro se litigant without access to eFile needs to file an emergency motion, a court of appeals may suspend regular order under Rule 2 and accept filings through email. [read post]