Search for: "Maher v Maher"
Results 141 - 160
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2018, 4:11 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Robin Maher looks at the recent decision in McCoy v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 74 [week ending on Sunday 29 November] – Bob Marley copyright | Nintendo TPM triumphs in Italy | GIs and TMs in the EU | Prebalin again | YouTube will defend fair use | End-of-year reading |Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd | Goodbye from Jeremy, and thank you from us | Greekat on plain packaging | Rovi Guides Inc v Virgin Media Ltd &… [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 75 [week ending on Sunday 6 December] – BHG on blocking injunctions | IP in Universities | Sweden on blocking injunctions | Canadian musings on patents | US Senate and trade secret reform | Chinese IP Courts | G1/14 referral and Article 108 EPC | PACE procedure (Procedure for Accelerated Conduct of Examination) ant the EPO | Greekat and trade mark partenalism | EPO Boards of Appeal tell AC: we were… [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:32 am
McGhee and Wood v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 1:30 pm
Contributors to the book include; John Boyce, Rachel Brandenburger, Jochen Burrichter, Maher Dabbah, Thomas Deisenhofer, Götz Drauz, Kirsten Edwards, Adam Fanaki, Calvin Goldman, Klaus Gugler, Barry Hawk, Scott Hemphill, Seonghoon Jeon, William Kovacic, Mel Marquis, Abel Mateus, Andreas Mundt, Lars-Hendrik Röller, Tadashi Shiraishi, Irwin Stelzer, James Venit, Sven Völcker, Vanessa Yanhua Zhang, Xinzhu Zhang [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 4:33 am
See Rutter Group's Civil Trials and Evidence; 18:352 (2007); California Constitution, Article VI, Section 13; Maher v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:10 am
(See Sun Graphics Corp. v Levy, Davis & Maher, LLP, 94 AD3d 669, 669 [I st Dept 2012], citing Stanski v Ezersky, 228 AD2d 311, 313 [1st Dept 1996].) [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:40 am
See Leedy v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:36 am
The US Supreme Court, in Salman v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:13 pm
See Maher v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 11:36 pm
Pierce v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:07 am
PRL USA Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
LB’ers: When it comes to Labor v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 9:06 am
Maher Terminals, LLC, 2015 WL 1810378, *8 (D.N.J. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:04 pm
Peter Maher and Patricia Hoyt Maher, 100 USPQ2d 1018 (TTAB 2011) [precedential]. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:05 am
See Maher v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am
White and Caperton v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:08 am
Maher, 100 USPQ2d 1018, 1024 (TTAB 2011). [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:34 am
* Diamonds are forever, but joint ventures are more fragile: court helps exorcise ghost of business failureKatfriend and occasional contributor Kevin Winters, pointing to a recent Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, a decision of Judge Hacon in Helme & Others v Maher & Another [2015] EWHC 3151 (IPEC) on a copyright infringement resulted from a business relationship that has gone sour. [read post]
