Search for: "Marbury v. Marbury" Results 141 - 160 of 883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2022, 3:56 am by Will Baude
I have come to believe that this is fundamentally just a question about "say[] what the law is," as Marbury v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 8:33 am by Dan Ernst
Thomas Bettge has posted Marbury in the Vanishing Cabinet: Evaluating Originalism in the Light of Judicial Review's Uncertain Origins, which appeared in the Willamette Law Review 55 (2018): 1-45:Although originalism has occasioned substantial rethinking of many facets of our constitutional law, the doctrine of judicial review articulated in Marbury v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:55 am by Bill
The textbooks and hornbooks and commentaries all start with Marbury v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:57 am
Here is the abstract: What we call "judicial review" was not established in Marbury v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:03 pm by Jeff Gamso
It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:43 am by SHG
Marshall’s most famous decision — Marbury v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 10:24 am by Guest Blogger
Remember the significance of Marbury v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 9:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Two centuries after Marbury v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  It dates from 1275, just years after the Magna Carta,  Once in a while we see a reference to Marbury v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 7:30 am by Robert Brammer
The federal judiciary has the authority to review actions of the legislative and executive branches to verify that they comport with the Constitution see Marbury v. [read post]