Search for: "Marcotte v. Marcotte"
Results 141 - 155
of 155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2011, 11:51 am
See Comit[eacute] de Apoyo a los Trabajadores Agricolas (CATA) v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:45 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Mayo Foundation v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Shanks v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:43 am
”[v] Drafting Policies & Using the Right Standard for the Right Circumstances When drafting and applying FMLA and other legally mandated policies, it’s important that employers, employee benefit plan sponsors and administrators and others use the correct standard for the circumstance prevented. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am
Judge Porteous also engaged in corrupt conduct after the Lifemark v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:55 am
By Cynthia Marcotte Stamer The Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights (OCR) has begun disclosing on its website the employer and other health plans, health care providers, health care clearinghouses and their business associates (Covered Entities) that report breaches of unsecured protected health information (UPIC) affecting more than 500 individuals as required by new rules enacted as part of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:50 pm
Connecticut AG Lawsuit Highlights Expanding Civil Damage Exposure Risks Of Noncompliance By Cynthia Marcotte Stamer By Wednesday, February 17, 2010, employer and other health plans and health insurers (“covered entities”) and service providers performing functions on behalf of these entities (“business associates”) must begin complying with tighter federal requirements for the use, access, protection and disclosure of protected health information under… [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:08 pm
Harris v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:23 pm
The Struthers Industries decision comes on the heels of EBSA’s success in Solis v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 3:55 pm
There’s a reported case, from Ontario, about 35 years ago: R. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:42 am
Montreal (City), 2009 SCC 44; File No. 32369 (class action sought to declare that municipal by laws imposing property tax are null and claim refund of taxes paid) Marcotte v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 10:39 am
Meyers v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 11:54 pm
Marcotte, 193 F.3d 72 (2d Cir.1999), the Third, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, Ninth, Eleventh, and District of Columbia Circuits apply a reasonableness test informed by the totality of the circumstances, see United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 12:33 am
Marcotte, 193 F.3d 72, and Nicholas v. [read post]
