Search for: "Mark 2 Mark, Inc."
Results 141 - 160
of 8,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2011, 9:35 am
Public Patent Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:10 pm
The Federal Court recently issued its judgment in NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 2:40 am
Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 9:45 am
See Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:45 am
Aqua Flora, Inc. et al., 2-10-cv-01459 (CAED October 15, 2010, Order) (Damrell, J.) [read post]
13 May 2008, 4:15 am
Tracie Martyn, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:15 am
Lost Key Rewards, Inc., Opposition No. 91185802 (November 15, 2010) [not precedential].Section 2(d): The USPS proved that it has used its collections boxes in the shape of the two registered marks shown below since about 1894, and since 1971 the boxes have been colored blue. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
The case is Chanel Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:59 pm
Inc to Rhapsody Inc. today. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:11 am
Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:36 am
Autodesk, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:26 pm
”[7] The message here is clear: while parody is often, and should be, associated with heightened First Amendment protections, it does not outweigh the importance of a mark as a source-identifier. [1] 875 F.2d 994, 999 (CA2 1989). [2] Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., 599 U.S. at 11 (citing Rogers v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:26 pm
”[7] The message here is clear: while parody is often, and should be, associated with heightened First Amendment protections, it does not outweigh the importance of a mark as a source-identifier. [1] 875 F.2d 994, 999 (CA2 1989). [2] Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., 599 U.S. at 11 (citing Rogers v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:01 am
Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:37 am
When a registration is issued based on acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f), then it is an established fact the mark lacks inherent distinctiveness. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:03 pm
The social networking website, Facebook, Inc. announced on June 9 that it will allow users to personalize their URLs (web addresses) with a unique user name (ie: facebook.com/username). [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 2:25 pm
In a spirited dissent, Judge Tymkovich argued that the totality of factors strongly confirmed that the Defendant's mark was likely to cause consumer confusion.More detail of Vail Assocs., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:04 am
Under Armour, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:05 am
s acquisition of certain assets from Bekins Van Lines, LLC and Bekins Holding Corp. on April 2, 2012, Corporate Transfer was allegedly notified that it was required to cease using all of the Bekins marks immediately, as it was not an agent for the new owner of the Bekins marks. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:54 am
Citigroup Inc. v. [read post]
