Search for: "Mark v. Wish"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2010, 2:26 am
Moritz v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 6:45 am
In PMS v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 3:16 am
In Elektra v. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 5:01 am
Mark D. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:40 am
Mark Thomson has accused the media of self-interest in their reporting of the mis-named “super-injunctions ” scandal. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 4:18 pm
The court nonetheless stressed that use of a mark in a domain name as such may be sufficient for constituting genuine use - just not in this case because the public would consider the use of the word Zappa as a general descriptive reference and would not understand it as a reference to the trade mark owner.For an in-depth analysis of this case, this Kat recommends Guido Westkamp’s current intelligence note published in JIPLP: “Personality trade marks and their… [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:38 pm
Case: Health World Ltd v Shin-Sun Australia Pty Ltd [2010] HCA 13.This appeal to the High Court is connected with Section 88(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1995. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 1:12 am
This makes sense, since the assignment of rights would lose their value if the original proprietor still maintained the capability to prevent importation when and where ever they wished. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:35 am
” At the time, Mark R. [read post]
2 May 2009, 8:32 pm
The filing of a petition 'cuts off' the ability of the registrant's 'resumed use to cure the defect.' In other words, if the prior registrant wishes to maintain its registration (if for no other reason than to sell out to the junior user), it can't simply rush to resume use - it will likely have to prove that it hasn't previously abandoned the mark. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
I The champagne of trade mark disputes I Jaguar Land Rover DEFEND[ER]s its trade mark I Länsförsäkringar, Länsförsäkringar, bork, bork, bork! [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 5:15 am
This week marks the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:02 am
The court ruled yesterday in Iancu v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
Yesterday morning, the Supreme Court decided Fernandez v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 4:03 pm
July 24, 2012 Hornak, J.), Judge Mark R. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:29 pm
Au-Tomotive Gold, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:34 am
S. 867, 876, and respondents wish to sue for millions of employment decisions at once. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 2:05 pm
Just one of many things Bill Clinton left his mark on that she wishes you'd forget. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:01 am
").Imagine that a start-up company wishes to sell frozen foods for orthodox Jews who only eat food that is kosher. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 10:41 pm
Ate My Heart Inc. v. [read post]